Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Apr 5, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 16, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Ghana Heart Initiative Training for Cardiac Arrest Management Among Health Care Professionals: Outcomes Evaluation Study (2019-2024)

Doku A, Tuglo LS, Osuoji C, Edzeame J, Broni M, Mainoo DD, Acquah AE, Honny K, Peters RJG, Agyemang C

Ghana Heart Initiative Training for Cardiac Arrest Management Among Health Care Professionals: Outcomes Evaluation Study (2019-2024)

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e75536

DOI: 10.2196/75536

PMID: 41474976

PMCID: 12826632

Ghana Heart Initiative training for cardiac arrest management among healthcare professionals: outcomes evaluation study (2019–2024)

  • Alfred Doku; 
  • Lawrence Sena Tuglo; 
  • Chiedozie Osuoji; 
  • Juliette Edzeame; 
  • Marisa Broni; 
  • David Danso Mainoo; 
  • Alberta Ewuziwaa Acquah; 
  • Kwatetso Honny; 
  • Ron J. G. Peters; 
  • Charles Agyemang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Health professionals are required to stay updated on the latest guidelines for basic life support (BLS) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) to quickly and effectively help patients survive a cardiac emergency. Since its inception in 2018, the Ghana Heart Initiative has built capacity and expertise to manage cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including cardiac emergencies. The study aimed to assess knowledge and proficiency of BLS and ACLS among health professionals in Ghana.

Objective:

To assess knowledge and skills of BLS and ACLS among health professionals through training to empower them to manage cardiac arrest effectively in Ghana.

Methods:

A total of 6,099 health professionals were trained in CVDs from 2019 to 2024 of which 541 was BLS and 302 was ACLS. A cross-sectional training-based study was conducted on the BLS and ACLS but only 229 of BLS (42%) and 124 of ACLS (41%) training between June 2019 and May 2023 had complete data for analysis. Knowledge and skills was evaluated through questionnaire and instructor-led skills assessment, based on the updated 2018 and 2020 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC).

Results:

The study showed that 75% of the health professionals had adequate knowledge and skills about BLS. Those who worked in primary healthcare facilities were 80% less likely (AOR = 0.20; 95% Cl: [0.07-0.59], p = 0.003) to have inadequate knowledge about BLS than those who worked in tertiary healthcare facilities. Workers from some region performed better in BLS: some were 4.94 times less likely to perform well (AOR = 4.94; 95% Cl: [1.17-20.80], p = 0.029). Over 73% of the health professionals had adequate knowledge and skills in ACLS. Compared with their male counterparts, females were 7.05 times less likely (AOR = 7.05; 95% Cl: [2.69 – 18.46], p < 0.001) to have requisite knowledge and skills in ACLS.

Conclusions:

BLS and ACLS knowledge and skills among healthcare professionals in Ghana were adequate post training.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Doku A, Tuglo LS, Osuoji C, Edzeame J, Broni M, Mainoo DD, Acquah AE, Honny K, Peters RJG, Agyemang C

Ghana Heart Initiative Training for Cardiac Arrest Management Among Health Care Professionals: Outcomes Evaluation Study (2019-2024)

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e75536

DOI: 10.2196/75536

PMID: 41474976

PMCID: 12826632

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.