Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Mar 28, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 4, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Active Surveillance for COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Using Sequential Analysis in Korea: Population-Based Retrospective Observational Study

Jeong NY, Cho H, Won H, Park S, Lee J, Park H, Choi NK

Active Surveillance for COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Using Sequential Analysis in Korea: Population-Based Retrospective Observational Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2026;12:e75094

DOI: 10.2196/75094

PMID: 42024871

Active Surveillance for COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Using Sequential Analysis in Korea: Population-based Retrospective Observational Study

  • Na-Young Jeong; 
  • Haerin Cho; 
  • Heehyun Won; 
  • Suvin Park; 
  • Joongyub Lee; 
  • Hyesook Park; 
  • Nam-Kyong Choi

ABSTRACT

Background:

With the advent of new vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccines introduced during the recent pandemic, the need for near-real-time active surveillance has increased to support timely regulatory decision-making.

Objective:

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of sequential monitoring for potential adverse events following immunization in Korea, focusing on COVID-19 vaccines.

Methods:

This population-based study utilized a linked database that combined the COVID-19 registry with national health insurance claims data. Subjects included are individuals aged over 12 years who received either monovalent or bivalent COVID-19 vaccines in Korea between February 2021 and March 2023. Monthly retrospective sequential testing was performed for three pre-specified outcomes (acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis, and anaphylaxis) as well as a negative control event (colonic diverticulitis). A Poisson-based maximized sequential probability ratio test was applied to compare post-vaccination incidence rates with historical background rates, accounting for multiple testing and claims processing delays. Analyses were stratified by age group, vaccine platform, and dose.

Results:

This study included over 43 million monovalent and 6.3 million bivalent vaccine recipients. Sequential analyses identified statistical signals for myocarditis following mRNA vaccines in individuals aged 12–64 years, and protein subunit vaccines in those aged 40–64 years. Signals for anaphylaxis were observed following mRNA and non-replicating viral vector vaccines in individuals aged over 18 years. No safety signals were identified for acute myocardial infarction and colonic diverticulitis. Sequential monitoring detected signals for myocarditis and anaphylaxis before regulatory authorities took safety actions, with the earliest signals observed on September 30 and April 30, 2021, respectively.

Conclusions:

Near-real-time sequential testing detected statistical safety signals for myocarditis and anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccination. These signals were recognized by the regulatory authority as associated with the vaccines, demonstrating the potential of this approach to detect signals requiring further causality assessments, particularly for newly introduced vaccines at an early stage.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jeong NY, Cho H, Won H, Park S, Lee J, Park H, Choi NK

Active Surveillance for COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Using Sequential Analysis in Korea: Population-Based Retrospective Observational Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2026;12:e75094

DOI: 10.2196/75094

PMID: 42024871

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.