Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Mar 25, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 27, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Automated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phenotyping and Control Assessment in Primary Care: Retrospective Multicenter Study Using the Seleida Model

Maya Viejo JD, Navarro Ros FM

Automated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phenotyping and Control Assessment in Primary Care: Retrospective Multicenter Study Using the Seleida Model

JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e74932

DOI: 10.2196/74932

PMID: 41082606

PMCID: 12517459

Automated COPD Phenotyping and Control Assessment in Primary Care: Insights from the Seleida Model

  • José David Maya Viejo; 
  • Fernando M. Navarro Ros

ABSTRACT

Background:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a major global health challenge. In primary care, inconsistent recording of symptom scales and lung function hinders timely risk stratification and proactive management. There is an urgent need for objective, automated tools that leverage routinely collected clinical data to identify patients with poor disease control and support equitable healthcare resource allocation.

Objective:

To validate the predictive performance of Seleida— a previously developed, bijective, deterministic model for real-time COPD control assessment and automated phenotyping—using real-world electronic health record (EHR) data, and to evaluate its applicability within routine clinical informatics workflows.

Methods:

Seleida applies deterministic analytics to two predefined, routinely collected variables: annual use of rescue inhalers [short-acting β-agonist (SABA)/ short-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA)] and antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory exacerbations. We implemented methods to verify the model’s bijectivity, compare two phenotyping approaches (126- and 21-combination systems), and demonstrate its feasibility as an automated screening tool for integration into healthcare informatics systems supporting COPD management.

Results:

In a real-world primary care cohort, Seleida demonstrated perfect concordance between its dual phenotyping systems (κ = 1.00, p < 0.001) and substantial agreement with real-world clinical phenotypes (κ = 0.70, p < 0.001). Its validated forward risk estimation and reverse phenotypic inference enable real-time control assessment and automated patient stratification. These results highlight Seleida’s potential as an interoperable screening tool for integration into clinical informatics workflows, supporting proactive and data-driven COPD management.

Conclusions:

This study confirms the clinical validity of Seleida as an innovative, automated, and scalable decision-support tool for COPD control assessment and phenotyping. Its ability to integrate seamlessly into routine healthcare informatics systems addresses a key gap in the early identification of patients at risk of poor disease control.

Conclusions:

Seleida offers a practical solution to enhance precision-guided and equitable COPD management. External validation and cost-effectiveness studies are ongoing to confirm its broader applicability and sustainability.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Maya Viejo JD, Navarro Ros FM

Automated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phenotyping and Control Assessment in Primary Care: Retrospective Multicenter Study Using the Seleida Model

JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e74932

DOI: 10.2196/74932

PMID: 41082606

PMCID: 12517459

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.