Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Mar 23, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 16, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Undergraduate Interprofessional Education: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Snead H, Hada D, Eldridge LA

Undergraduate Interprofessional Education: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e74394

DOI: 10.2196/74394

PMID: 41950342

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Undergraduate Interpersonal Training: Pathways to Health Professions Protocol

  • Hannah Snead; 
  • Dhwaniben Hada; 
  • Lori Ann Eldridge

ABSTRACT

Interprofessional Education (IPE) is essential for fostering collaboration and communication among healthcare professionals to improve patient outcomes. Early IPE training for pre-health undergraduate students has been shown to enhance teamwork, dismantle stereotypes, and build self-efficacy in healthcare settings. Self-efficacy is the belief that one can achieve their goals and succeed at tasks. These outcomes contribute to creating a cohesive and equitable healthcare environment focused on patient-centered care. Despite evidence supporting the benefits of IPE training, there is a lack of consistent implementation at the undergraduate level across institutions. Programs that have adopted IPE have demonstrated improved student preparedness, better interprofessional collaboration, and enhanced patient care outcomes. Our study addresses this gap in undergraduate IPE by examining the impact of a structured IPE training program, Pathway to Health Professions, designed for pre-health ECU undergraduate students who are members of ‘Buff in Scrubs’, an ECU organization. Our study employs a mixed-methods approach, including retrospective surveys and open-ended questions, to assess changes in participants' attitudes, skills, and competencies pre-and post-trainings. Data will be collected from January 2025 to April 2025. We hypothesize that early and structured exposure to IPE training will significantly enhance pre-health undergraduate students' confidence, understanding of interprofessional roles, and ability to collaborate effectively. By focusing on self-efficacy-based skills, we hope to equip pre-health students with critical collaboration and communication skills early in their education. We expect improvements in participants’ perceived preparedness for advanced healthcare education and patient-centered care. By improving perceived preparedness, we aim to also increase students’ self-efficacy and preparedness for graduate school applications. Our undergraduate IPE program, Pathway to Health Professions, seeks to bridge the gap in IPE implementation at the undergraduate level. We aim to prepare future healthcare professionals to contribute to cohesive teams and improve patient outcomes. This work underscores the need for broader adoption of IPE training in undergraduate education to enhance healthcare collaboration and equity.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Snead H, Hada D, Eldridge LA

Undergraduate Interprofessional Education: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e74394

DOI: 10.2196/74394

PMID: 41950342

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.