Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Mar 21, 2025
Date Accepted: Jul 10, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Cost-Effectiveness of Internet-Delivered Emotion Regulation Therapy for Adolescents With Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Within-Trial Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Bjureberg J, Ojala O, Rasmusson B, Malmgren J, Hellner C, Sampaio F, Flygare O

Cost-Effectiveness of Internet-Delivered Emotion Regulation Therapy for Adolescents With Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Within-Trial Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e74303

DOI: 10.2196/74303

PMID: 40863344

PMCID: 12382421

Cost-effectiveness of Internet-Dlivered Emotion Regulation Therapy for Adolescents With nonsuicidal Self-Injury

  • Johan Bjureberg; 
  • Olivia Ojala; 
  • Björn Rasmusson; 
  • Jessica Malmgren; 
  • Clara Hellner; 
  • Filipa Sampaio; 
  • Oskar Flygare

ABSTRACT

Background:

Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is common among adolescents and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes as well suicidal behaviour. Current treatments are resource-intensive and may not be accessible to all adolescents with NSSI. Internet-delivered emotion regulation individual therapy for adolescents (IERITA) with nonsuicidal self-injury disorder is a promising treatment option, but its cost-effectiveness is unknown.

Objective:

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of IERITA for adolescents with nonsuicidal self-injury disorder.

Methods:

Within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial at three child and adolescent mental health services in Sweden (n = 166). Twelve weeks of IERITA plus treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU only were compared. The primary outcome was frequency of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) at 1-month post-treatment. Secondary outcomes were NSSI remission and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

Results:

IERITA led to reductions in NSSI frequency, a higher proportion of participants with NSSI remission, and more QALYs at 1-month post-treatment, at additional healthcare costs of $3663 (95% CI $2182 to $5002) and societal costs of $4458 ($-577 to $9509). The incremental cost of one additional NSSI remission at 1-month post-treatment was $18,677, and the incremental cost per QALY gained was $792,244 for IERITA+TAU relative to TAU. IERITA had a 8% probability of being cost-effective at a societal willingness to-pay threshold of $84,000 for one QALY at 1-month post-treatment, which increased to 18% at 3-months post-treatment.

Conclusions:

IERITA delivered adjunctive to TAU led to improvements in NSSI frequency, remission, and QALYs, at additional costs compared to TAU only. This study provides an estimate of the additional cost of delivering IERITA, however, future studies should include longer follow-up periods to better assess the magnitude of the effects on QALYs and societal costs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bjureberg J, Ojala O, Rasmusson B, Malmgren J, Hellner C, Sampaio F, Flygare O

Cost-Effectiveness of Internet-Delivered Emotion Regulation Therapy for Adolescents With Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Within-Trial Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e74303

DOI: 10.2196/74303

PMID: 40863344

PMCID: 12382421

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.