Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 21, 2025
Date Accepted: May 16, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Toward Normalizing Inclusive Design by Uncovering Patient Experiences of a Web Portal in a Dental Hospital: Mixed Methods Study

Bamgboje-Ayodele A, Raubenheimer J, Paonne A, Yi J, Jayawardena T, Ajwani S, Szuba E, Chowdhury T, Dao P, Ahmed M, Von Huben A, Howell M, Nixon N, Dunn A, Jones A, Baysari M

Toward Normalizing Inclusive Design by Uncovering Patient Experiences of a Web Portal in a Dental Hospital: Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e74275

DOI: 10.2196/74275

PMID: 40811662

PMCID: 12352587

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Towards normalising inclusive design: Uncovering patient experiences of a web portal in a dental hospital

  • Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele; 
  • Jacques Raubenheimer; 
  • Anna Paonne; 
  • Jessica Yi; 
  • Tamasha Jayawardena; 
  • Shilpi Ajwani; 
  • Eugenia Szuba; 
  • Tanmay Chowdhury; 
  • Phu Dao; 
  • Mostafa Ahmed; 
  • Amy Von Huben; 
  • Martin Howell; 
  • Nicole Nixon; 
  • Adam Dunn; 
  • Aaron Jones; 
  • Melissa Baysari

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patient portals can improve care delivery and efficient use of healthcare resources. Barriers to uptake can hinder improvements, particularly for older people (>65 years) and those who are culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD).

Objective:

Our aim was to evaluate the usability and overall patient experience of a patient portal, with a specific focus on CALD and older people.

Methods:

A mixed methods study at a dental hospital included a patient experience survey that was administered before (2111 patients) and after (2445 patients) portal implementation, semi-structured interviews (18 patients), usability survey (235 patients) and a scenario-based usability evaluation (17 patients).

Results:

Younger participants (<65 years old) reported that the portal was easy to use and simple. However, design problems, including inadequate incorporation of inclusivity, was found to more often limit usability for older and CALD people. Usability evaluations indicated that all participants could log in with the one-time password, but most were assisted. Only 3 of 17 participants were able to send a message to the clinic. Other usability problems identified were focused on display, content, layout, functionality and navigation categories.

Conclusions:

The use of inclusive design principles when designing patient portals is necessary for successfully engaging all patients. Our study highlights the importance of normalising inclusive designs in patient portals to ensure that priority populations such as such as older and CALD people are not marginalised by design.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bamgboje-Ayodele A, Raubenheimer J, Paonne A, Yi J, Jayawardena T, Ajwani S, Szuba E, Chowdhury T, Dao P, Ahmed M, Von Huben A, Howell M, Nixon N, Dunn A, Jones A, Baysari M

Toward Normalizing Inclusive Design by Uncovering Patient Experiences of a Web Portal in a Dental Hospital: Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e74275

DOI: 10.2196/74275

PMID: 40811662

PMCID: 12352587

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.