Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Mar 21, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 4, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining the Acceptability and Effectiveness of a Self-Directed, Web-Based Resource for Stress and Coping in University: Randomized Controlled Trial

Böke BN, Mettler J, Bastien L, Cho S, Heath NL

Examining the Acceptability and Effectiveness of a Self-Directed, Web-Based Resource for Stress and Coping in University: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Ment Health 2026;13:e74205

DOI: 10.2196/74205

PMID: 41576346

PMCID: 12829895

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Does it Work? Examining the Acceptability and Effectiveness of a Self-Directed, Web-Based Resource for Stress and Coping in University: Randomized Controlled Study

  • Bilun Naz Böke; 
  • Jessica Mettler; 
  • Laurianne Bastien; 
  • Sohyun Cho; 
  • Nancy Lee Heath

ABSTRACT

Background:

University students face high levels of stress with limited support for coping and well-being. Campus mental health services are increasingly using digital resources to support students’ stress-management and coping capacity. However, the effectiveness of providing this support through web-based, self-directed means remains unclear.

Objective:

Using a randomized-controlled design, this study examined the acceptability and effectiveness of a self-directed, web-based resource containing evidence-based strategies for stress-management and healthy coping for university students. The study additionally explored the potential benefits of screening and directing students to personalized resources aligned with their needs.

Methods:

Participants consisted of 242 university students (79.9% women; mean age 21.15), assigned to one of three groups (i.e., directed to personalized resources, non-directed, and waitlist comparison), and completed pre, post (4 weeks), and follow-up (8 weeks) measures for stress, coping, and well-being. The resource groups also completed acceptability measures at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the web-based resource access.

Results:

Results indicate high acceptability, reflecting students’ satisfaction with the resource. Furthermore, significant decreases in stress and unhealthy coping as well as significant increases in coping self-efficacy and healthy coping in the resource groups relative to the comparison group were found. Interestingly, the directed approach showed no added benefit over non-directed resource access.

Conclusions:

In summary, this study demonstrates the acceptability and effectiveness of a self-directed digital resource platform as a viable support option for university student stress and coping.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Böke BN, Mettler J, Bastien L, Cho S, Heath NL

Examining the Acceptability and Effectiveness of a Self-Directed, Web-Based Resource for Stress and Coping in University: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Ment Health 2026;13:e74205

DOI: 10.2196/74205

PMID: 41576346

PMCID: 12829895

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.