Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR AI

Date Submitted: Mar 19, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 27, 2025 - May 22, 2025
Date Accepted: Mar 16, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating Medical Students’ Perceptions of AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation (CarePilot): Cross-Sectional Study

Bindi J, Jamali T, Danze T, Zabaneh I, Fat M, Tutera J, Cox J

Evaluating Medical Students’ Perceptions of AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation (CarePilot): Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR AI 2026;5:e74198

DOI: 10.2196/74198

PMID: 42149782

Evaluating AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation: Medical Student Perceptions of CarePilot in Simulated Encounters

  • Jonathan Bindi; 
  • Taylor Jamali; 
  • Talia Danze; 
  • Iza Zabaneh; 
  • Marisa Fat; 
  • Joseph Tutera; 
  • James Cox

ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into healthcare to streamline documentation and improve clinician efficiency. AI powered documentation tools, such as CarePilot, may reduce administrative burdens and help mitigate burnout. However, their usability and perceived value among medical trainees remains underexplored.

Objective:

To evaluate medical students’ perceptions of usability, efficiency, and satisfaction when using an AI powered documentation system in a simulated clinical setting.

Methods:

This cross sectional study was conducted at the Burnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University. Forty four third and fourth year medical students participated in a standardized patient encounter for headache. Using CarePilot, participants documented patient history, physical examination findings, clinical reasoning, and management decisions. Afterward, they completed a 27 item Likert scale survey assessing ease of use, documentation efficiency, organization, and overall satisfaction.

Results:

Over 75 percent of respondents rated ease of use, learnability, interface likability, and documentation organization positively. However, approximately 30 percent reported neutral or dissatisfied opinions regarding overall satisfaction, citing workflow interruptions and limited functionality that could affect patient interaction.

Conclusions:

CarePilot was generally perceived as user friendly and effective for organizing documentation. Nonetheless, areas for refinement, particularly workflow integration and expanded functionalities, may enhance satisfaction and clinical applicability. These findings inform future design and implementation strategies for AI powered documentation tools in healthcare education and beyond.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bindi J, Jamali T, Danze T, Zabaneh I, Fat M, Tutera J, Cox J

Evaluating Medical Students’ Perceptions of AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation (CarePilot): Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR AI 2026;5:e74198

DOI: 10.2196/74198

PMID: 42149782

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.