Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Mar 13, 2025
Date Accepted: Jul 4, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing Multiple Imputation Methods to Address Missing Patient Demographics in Immunization Information Systems: Retrospective Cohort Study

Brown S, Kudia O, Kleine K, Kidd B, Wines R, Meckes N

Comparing Multiple Imputation Methods to Address Missing Patient Demographics in Immunization Information Systems: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e73916

DOI: 10.2196/73916

PMID: 40857554

PMCID: 12380239

Comparing Multiple Imputation Methods to Address Missing Patient Demographics in Immunization Information Systems: Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Sara Brown; 
  • Ousswa Kudia; 
  • Kaye Kleine; 
  • Bryndan Kidd; 
  • Robert Wines; 
  • Nathanael Meckes

ABSTRACT

Background:

Surveillance data are essential for public health initiatives; however, missing data is often a challenge, potentially introducing bias and impacting the accuracy of vaccine coverage assessments, particularly in addressing disparities.

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning-based imputation methods, including Iterative Imputer and miceforest, in reconciling missing demographic data within large immunization datasets and compare their computational efficiency to multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE).

Methods:

We analyzed 2021-2022 flu vaccination and demographic data from the West Virginia Immunization Information System (N=2,302,036), where race (15%) and ethnicity (34%) were missing. MICE, Iterative Imputer, and miceforest were used to impute missing variables, generating 15 datasets each. Computational efficiency and the ability to preserve demographic distributions were assessed.

Results:

After imputation, an additional 780,339 observations were obtained compared to complete case analysis. MICE and miceforest best preserved the proportional distribution of demographics. Computational time varied, with MICE requiring 14 hours, Iterative Imputer 2 minutes, and miceforest 10 minutes for 15 imputations. Post-imputation estimates indicated a 0.87-18% reduction in flu vaccination coverage rates.

Conclusions:

Miceforest offers a flexible, fast, and iterative approach for imputing missing demographic data while preserving underlying distributions and mitigating bias. Cloud-based computing further enhances efficiency by offloading resource-intensive tasks, enabling parallel execution, and minimizing processing delays. These advancements support timely analyses, facilitate culturally responsive decision-making, and optimize public health performance.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Brown S, Kudia O, Kleine K, Kidd B, Wines R, Meckes N

Comparing Multiple Imputation Methods to Address Missing Patient Demographics in Immunization Information Systems: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e73916

DOI: 10.2196/73916

PMID: 40857554

PMCID: 12380239

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.