Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 12, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 26, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Identifying Biomedical Entities for Datasets in Scientific Articles: 4-Step Cache-Augmented Generation Approach Using GPT-4o and PubTator 3.0

Giuliani C, Benadi G, Engel F, Werner J, Watter M, Schwarzer G, Groß O, Zeiser R, Binder H, Kaier K

Identifying Biomedical Entities for Datasets in Scientific Articles: 4-Step Cache-Augmented Generation Approach Using GPT-4o and PubTator 3.0

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e73822

DOI: 10.2196/73822

PMID: 41264807

PMCID: 12633840

Identifying biomedical entities for datasets in scientific articles - A 4-step cache-augmented generation approach using GPT-4o and PubTator 3.0

  • Claudia Giuliani; 
  • Gita Benadi; 
  • Felix Engel; 
  • Jonas Werner; 
  • Manuel Watter; 
  • Guido Schwarzer; 
  • Olaf Groß; 
  • Robert Zeiser; 
  • Harald Binder; 
  • Klaus Kaier

ABSTRACT

Background:

The accurate annotation of biomedical entities in scientific articles is essential for effective metadata generation, ensuring data findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability in collaborative research.

Objective:

This study introduces a novel 4-step Cache-Augmented Generation (CAG) approach to identify biomedical entities, leveraging GPT-4o and PubTator 3.0.

Methods:

The method integrates (1) GPT-4o-based entity generation, (2) PubTator-based validation, (3) term extraction based on a metadata-schema developed for the specific research area, and (4) a combined evaluation of PubTator-validated and schema-related terms. Applied to 23 articles published in the context of the Collaborative Research Centre OncoEscape, the process was validated through supervised, face-to-face interviews with article authors, allowing an assessment of annotation precision using random effects meta-analysis.

Results:

The approach yielded a mean number of 19.6 schema-related and 6.7 PubTator-validated biomedical entities per article. Overall precision was 98% [95%CI 94%-100%]. In a subsample (N=20), available supplemental material was included in the prediction process, which did not increase precision (98%, CI 95%-100%). Moreover, the mean number of schema-related (20.1, p=0.561) and PubTator-validated (6.7, p=0.681) biomedical entities did not increase with the additional information provided with the supplement.

Conclusions:

This study highlights the potential of CAG for metadata annotation. The findings underscore the practical feasibility of full-text analysis for routine metadata annotation in biomedical research.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Giuliani C, Benadi G, Engel F, Werner J, Watter M, Schwarzer G, Groß O, Zeiser R, Binder H, Kaier K

Identifying Biomedical Entities for Datasets in Scientific Articles: 4-Step Cache-Augmented Generation Approach Using GPT-4o and PubTator 3.0

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e73822

DOI: 10.2196/73822

PMID: 41264807

PMCID: 12633840

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.