Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health
Date Submitted: Mar 11, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 31, 2025
Investigating the Association of Psychosocial Characteristics and eHealth Literacy: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study on Hybrid Secondary Prevention in Mental Health
ABSTRACT
Background:
Increasing psychosocial burdens, such as stress and anxiety, underscore the need for accessible and effective prevention programs. Hybrid approaches, combining in-person and digital components, aim to reduce barriers and enhance flexibility. However, their effectiveness depends on participants' eHealth literacy, which influences their ability to engage with digital tools. Understanding how psychosocial characteristics relate to eHealth literacy can provide insights for improving intervention design.
Objective:
This study employs cluster analysis to explore the relationship between psychosocial characteristics and eHealth literacy in a hybrid mental health prevention program. By identifying distinct psychosocial profiles and analyzing their differences in eHealth literacy levels and patterns, this person-centered approach enables a nuanced understanding of eHealth literacy disparities beyond traditional variable-centered linear models. Additionally, the study examines how sociodemographic variables are associated with eHealth literacy, providing insights into the role of psychosocial diversity in hybrid prevention programs.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted with participants of the RV Fit Mental Health intervention (January–December 2024). Psychosocial characteristics, including anxiety, depression, optimism, pessimism, quality of life, self-efficacy, stress, and work ability, were assessed alongside eHealth literacy (eHealth Literacy and Use Scale [eHLUS], eHealth Literacy Scale [eHEALS]). To identify distinct psychosocial profiles, cluster analysis was employed. A generalized linear model was applied to analyze associations between cluster membership, eHealth literacy, and sociodemographic variables. Finally, correlation matrices were used to further explore the relationships between psychosocial characteristics and eHealth literacy.
Results:
A total of 173 participants were included. Four clusters were identified based on psychosocial characteristics. Significant associations were found between cluster membership and eHealth literacy, including the overall eHLUS score (P = .004) and its dimension of autonomous use and technical access (P = .003). Cluster 3 (n = 65) had the most favorable psychosocial characteristics and the highest eHealth literacy levels. Cluster 4 (n = 36) exhibited the least favorable psychosocial characteristics but mid-range eHealth literacy levels. Cluster 2 (n = 45) showed the lowest eHealth literacy levels despite a mid-range psychosocial profile. Cluster 1 (n = 27) demonstrated mid-range eHealth literacy levels and mid-range psychosocial characteristics. Additionally, age and subjective socioeconomic status were significantly associated with eHealth literacy levels. Beyond the identified clusters, significant correlations were observed between individual psychosocial characteristic variables and eHealth literacy.
Conclusions:
The cluster analysis identified distinct psychosocial profiles with varying levels of eHealth literacy, demonstrating that psychosocial characteristics are associated with eHealth literacy in diverse ways. This person-centered approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of these associations and highlights the importance of considering subgroup-specific needs in hybrid prevention programs. Certain groups may require additional support to effectively navigate eHealth tools. These findings emphasize the relevance of tailored intervention strategies that account for psychosocial diversity in eHealth engagement. Clinical Trial: The quantitative data collection was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register under the following ID: DRKS00033080 (registration date: December 7, 2023).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.