Currently submitted to: JMIR Preprints
Date Submitted: Mar 8, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 8, 2025 - Feb 21, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Unlocking the Secrets Beneath: Utilizing the Water Quality Index (WQI) to Assess Groundwater Contamination Near Dumpsites – A Case Study of Port Harcourt
ABSTRACT
Background:
Groundwater contamination poses a significant public health risk, particularly in urban areas with inadequate waste management. Dumpsites serve as major sources of pollutants, including heavy metals, which infiltrate aquifers through leachate migration. Port Harcourt, Nigeria, faces increasing groundwater quality concerns due to the proliferation of uncontrolled waste disposal sites.
Objective:
This study aims to evaluate the spatial and seasonal variations in groundwater quality around dumpsites in Port Harcourt and determine the suitability of groundwater for drinking based on WQI values. It also seeks to identify contamination patterns and assess the influence of rainfall on pollutant dispersion. Furthermore, the study compares findings with global research to establish broader implications for waste management and public health. By doing so, it provides a scientific basis for policy recommendations aimed at mitigating groundwater pollution.
Methods:
Groundwater samples were collected from various locations around major dumpsites in Port Harcourt during dry and rainy seasons. Physicochemical parameters, including heavy metal concentrations, were analyzed to compute WQI values. Comparative analysis with previous studies was conducted to validate observed contamination trends. The impact of leachate migration on water quality was assessed using seasonal variations in WQI values.
Results:
Findings reveal significant spatial and seasonal fluctuations in groundwater quality. While Choba exhibited excellent water quality, Sasun, Olumeni, and Epirikom recorded dangerously high WQI values, indicating unsuitability for drinking. Seasonal variations showed that rainfall exacerbated contamination levels, as seen in Eleme, where WQI increased from 56.362 in the dry season to 140.928 in the rainy season. The study aligns with previous research from India, China, and Ghana, demonstrating that landfill leachates and surface runoff are key contributors to groundwater degradation.
Conclusions:
The study confirms that dumpsite leachates significantly impact groundwater quality, posing a major risk to public health. The high WQI values in several locations highlight the need for urgent interventions. Findings align with global research on groundwater contamination, emphasizing the critical role of effective waste management in reducing environmental pollution. To mitigate groundwater pollution from dumpsite leachates, it is essential to implement stringent waste management policies that regulate landfill operations and prevent leachate infiltration into aquifers. Establishing continuous groundwater monitoring programs can help detect contamination trends early and guide timely intervention measures. Additionally, promoting alternative potable water sources in highly contaminated areas is crucial to reducing health risks for affected communities. The adoption of modern landfill technologies, such as leachate treatment and containment systems, should be prioritized to minimize pollution and safeguard water resources for future generations. This study contributes to the growing body of research on groundwater contamination by providing empirical evidence of the impact of dumpsites in an urban African setting. The findings underscore the urgent need for improved waste management policies and public health interventions. By aligning with global research, this study reinforces the importance of sustainable environmental practices to safeguard water resources and protect communities from the adverse effects of pollution.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.