Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 5, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 7, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

An Exploration of How Functional Neurological Disorder Is Discussed on X (Twitter): Mixed Methods Study Using Social Network and Content Analysis

McLoughlin C, Wang JY, Do F, Kanbayashi T, Couturier A, Carson A, Stone J

An Exploration of How Functional Neurological Disorder Is Discussed on X (Twitter): Mixed Methods Study Using Social Network and Content Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73439

DOI: 10.2196/73439

PMID: 41106819

PMCID: 12579298

How Functional Neurological Disorder is discussed on X (Twitter): A Social Network and Content Analysis

  • Caoimhe McLoughlin; 
  • Jing-Yi Wang; 
  • Florence Do; 
  • Takamichi Kanbayashi; 
  • Anna Couturier; 
  • Alan Carson; 
  • Jon Stone

ABSTRACT

Background:

Social networks strongly influence health outcomes. The impact of online social networks while much less studied, is a growing area of concern. We aimed to analyse and describe how Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) is discussed on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter).

Objective:

We aimed to analyse and describe how Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) is discussed on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter).

Methods:

Using search terms related to FND, the authors collected data from 426 users and 1,104 posts generating a total of 7,640 replies and reposts over a two-month timeframe. Quantitative descriptive and social network analyses were carried out to map key influential users and communities, in addition to measuring influence of users. Content analysis was undertaken to describe the prevalent topics being discussed.

Results:

More users overall were associated with conditions outside FND (n=180/42%), mostly Long Covid and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), compared with FND (n=148/35%). Self-declared patients comprised 41% of posts (n=155/36.4% of users). Social network analysis revealed two separate communities with little interaction, with prominence of ME/CFS and Long Covid-associated users over FND users. Seven of the top ten most influential users often displayed anti-FND views, while FND organisations and professionals had much less influence. Content analysis showed themes of conflict, deception, mistreatment and knowledge.

Conclusions:

A large proportion of the discourse around FND on X is shaped by users who are dismissive of the concept of FND, and those associated with it. These findings have implications for individuals getting support for a condition that is already widely misunderstood. This study could provide a template for assessing how other conditions are perceived online Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

McLoughlin C, Wang JY, Do F, Kanbayashi T, Couturier A, Carson A, Stone J

An Exploration of How Functional Neurological Disorder Is Discussed on X (Twitter): Mixed Methods Study Using Social Network and Content Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73439

DOI: 10.2196/73439

PMID: 41106819

PMCID: 12579298

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.