Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Feb 24, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 27, 2025 - Apr 24, 2025
Date Accepted: May 28, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Social Media Use, Influencer Status, and Outdoor Risk-Taking in Australian Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey

Cornell S, Peden A

Social Media Use, Influencer Status, and Outdoor Risk-Taking in Australian Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e73089

DOI: 10.2196/73089

PMID: 40840537

PMCID: 12370294

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

More time spent on social media correlates to greater self-assessed risk-taking behaviour in the outdoors

  • Samuel Cornell; 
  • Amy Peden

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is growing awareness of the broader health-related harms of social media, yet research on social media-related injury mortality and morbidity remains limited. Emerging evidence suggests links between excessive social media use and increased risks of self-harm, cyberbullying-related distress, and dangerous viral challenges but there has been limited research on the link between time spent on social media and environmental risk taking, such as risky selfies. However, comprehensive epidemiological studies and policy-driven interventions remain scarce, highlighting the need for further investigation into the public health implications of digital engagement.

Objective:

This research aimed to examine the relationship between self-reported time spent on social media, influencer status, and risk-taking behaviours among Australians, considering implications for injury prevention.

Methods:

Via a national cross-sectional survey of Australian social media users (n = 509) participants reported their average daily time spent on social media, whether they identified as a social media influencer, and if they had ever engaged in risk-taking behaviour to create social media content. Chi-square and t-tests were conducted to explore associations.

Results:

Among participants, 9.4% self-reported engaging in risk-taking behaviour in the outdoors. Influencers were significantly more likely to report risk-taking (48.3%) compared to non-influencers (4.4%) (χ² = 110.57, p < 0.001). Risk-takers also spent significantly more time on social media (M = 2.05, SD = 1.04) compared to non-risk-takers (M = 1.37, SD = 1.04), t(57.22) = 4.31, p < 0.001.

Conclusions:

Interventions such as real-time alerts, pop-up warnings, and geolocated safety information may help curb risky behaviours among social media users, particularly influencers and heavy users. Social media platforms and policymakers should collaborate to promote safer behaviours and raise awareness about the risks associated with creating content. Targeted interventions for heavy social media users, and those that consider themselves social media influencers are required to reduce risky behaviours that may lead to injury in outdoor settings.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Cornell S, Peden A

Social Media Use, Influencer Status, and Outdoor Risk-Taking in Australian Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e73089

DOI: 10.2196/73089

PMID: 40840537

PMCID: 12370294

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.