Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Feb 21, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 14, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

An Ultra-Brief Informant Questionnaire for Case Finding of Cognitive Impairment Across Diverse Literacy: Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Liew TM, Yip KF, Narasimhalu K, Ting SKS, Li W, Tay SY, Koay WI

An Ultra-Brief Informant Questionnaire for Case Finding of Cognitive Impairment Across Diverse Literacy: Diagnostic Accuracy Study

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e72963

DOI: 10.2196/72963

PMID: 41494009

PMCID: 12772941

An Ultra-brief Informant Questionnaire for Case-finding of Cognitive Impairment across Diverse Literacy

  • Tau Ming Liew; 
  • King Fan Yip; 
  • Kaavya Narasimhalu; 
  • Simon Kang Seng Ting; 
  • Weishan Li; 
  • Sze Yan Tay; 
  • Way Inn Koay

ABSTRACT

Background:

Undiagnosed cognitive impairment poses a global challenge, prompting recent interest in ultra-brief screening questionnaires (comprising <2–3 items) to efficiently identify individuals needing further evaluation. However, evidence on ultra-brief questionnaires remains limited, particularly regarding their validity across diverse literacy levels.

Objective:

(1) To develop an ultra-brief questionnaire that performs well in detecting cognitive impairment (i.e. mild cognitive impairment or dementia; MCI/dementia) across diverse literacy; (2) To compare its performance with an established questionnaire (AD8; The Eight-item Informant Interview to Differentiate Aging and Dementia).

Methods:

This diagnostic study involved 1,856 participants aged ≥65 years (median education=10 years; range=0–23 years), prospectively recruited from community settings in Singapore. Participants and informants completed 15 cognition-related questions. MCI/dementia were diagnosed via comprehensive assessment and consensus conference. Sample was randomly split 70/30 – Training sample (70%) was used to derive an ultra-brief questionnaire from the 15 cognition-related questions (using an exhaustive search approach); Test sample (30%) evaluated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results:

The new questionnaire comprised two informant questions (Assistance with medications and Worry about cognition), plus Age and Years of education. It demonstrated excellent performance in detecting MCI/dementia (AUC=85%, 95%CI=80–90%), significantly better (p=0.003) than a nested baseline model (comprising Age and Years of education; AUC=78%, 95%CI=73–83%). In contrast, AD8 had an AUC of 76% (95%CI=70–83%), not significantly different (p=1.000) from the baseline model. The questionnaire’s performance was consistent across education subgroups and varying prevalence scenarios. Two optimal cutoffs were used – the lower cutoff provided 80% sensitivity and 96% negative predictive value; the upper cutoff provided 99% specificity and 81% positive predictive value. A web-based calculator is available for public use.

Conclusions:

This ultra-brief questionnaire enables rapid screening for cognitive impairment (in <1 minute) by family members or as part of community geriatric assessments. Its excellent performance across literacy levels supports its utility for case-finding in diverse populations, including underserved communities and lower- and middle-income countries.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Liew TM, Yip KF, Narasimhalu K, Ting SKS, Li W, Tay SY, Koay WI

An Ultra-Brief Informant Questionnaire for Case Finding of Cognitive Impairment Across Diverse Literacy: Diagnostic Accuracy Study

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e72963

DOI: 10.2196/72963

PMID: 41494009

PMCID: 12772941

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.