Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Feb 20, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 14, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessment of Quality and Utility of Patient-Taken Smartphone Photographs of Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Survey Study

Ali Z, Thomsen K, Vestergaard C, Thomsen SF

Assessment of Quality and Utility of Patient-Taken Smartphone Photographs of Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Survey Study

JMIR Dermatol 2026;9:e72916

DOI: 10.2196/72916

PMID: 41592324

PMCID: 12844854

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Smartphone photographs of atopic dermatitis captured by patients are of good quality and useful in the clinic: A clinical survey

  • Zarqa Ali; 
  • Kenneth Thomsen; 
  • Christian Vestergaard; 
  • Simon Francis Thomsen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Atopic dermatitis (AD) has a relapsing and remitting nature and scheduled clinic visits only provide a snapshot of the skin condition at the moment.

Objective:

To investigate the quality of patient taken smartphone photographs of AD skin lesions and characterize patients using smartphone photographs as a tool to assist the physician to show disease activity in between consultations.

Methods:

Patients from two university outpatient clinics specialized in AD were surveyed. A questionnaire regarding digital readiness was completed and a previously taken skin lesion photograph on the patients’ own smartphone was evaluated.

Results:

Between February and September 2024 one hundred questionnaires were completed, around 60% from the capital region and 40% from the urban area, including 62 men and 38 women. The mean age of the recruited patients was 33.9 years (SD 19.9). About 78% of the patients used computer, laptop or tablets often or always, 86% corresponded with the healthcare system using technology e.g. via e-mail to the general practitioner or contact with hospitals via apps. More than 50% (n=52) strongly agreed or agreed to the statement that they would prefer a remote online visit with e.g. upload of skin lesion photographs over a routine physical in office visit. Almost 3 out of 4 patients had a photograph of their AD skin lesion on their smartphone, the majority (54%) with the sole intention of presenting it to a physician. The photographs were of good quality in 85% of the cases, and the majority (86%) of the smartphone photographs were assessed to be useful for diagnostic and clinical evaluation. Age above 30 years decreased the chance of having captured a skin lesion smartphone photograph by 26%, and use of systemic treatment decreased the chance by 21.5%.

Conclusions:

Patients with AD followed in an outpatient clinic often capture a good quality photograph of their skin lesion prior to consultation with the intention of presenting it to the physician.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ali Z, Thomsen K, Vestergaard C, Thomsen SF

Assessment of Quality and Utility of Patient-Taken Smartphone Photographs of Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Survey Study

JMIR Dermatol 2026;9:e72916

DOI: 10.2196/72916

PMID: 41592324

PMCID: 12844854

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.