Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 20, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 28, 2025 - Apr 28, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 21, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Digital Mental Health Interventions for Young People Aged 16-25 Years: Scoping Review

Potts C, Kealy C, McNulty J, Madrid-Cagigal A, Wilson T, Mulvenna M, O'Neill S, Donohoe G, Barry M

Digital Mental Health Interventions for Young People Aged 16-25 Years: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72892

DOI: 10.2196/72892

PMID: 40344661

PMCID: 12102633

Digital mental health interventions for young people aged 16-25: scoping review

  • Courtney Potts; 
  • Carmen Kealy; 
  • Jamie McNulty; 
  • Alba Madrid-Cagigal; 
  • Thomas Wilson; 
  • Maurice Mulvenna; 
  • Siobhan O'Neill; 
  • Gary Donohoe; 
  • Margaret Barry

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital mental health interventions for young people offer a promising avenue for promoting mental wellbeing and addressing mental health issues in this population.

Objective:

This study aims to explore the range of digital mental health supports available for young people aged 16 - 25 years, with a particular focus on the types of digital tools, modalities, delivery format, target population, and study retention rates.

Methods:

The scoping review was conducted in six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Cochrane Library and PsychInfo), and a total of 145 articles were included. The findings reveal a diverse landscape of studies globally, equally focusing on prevention and promotion of mental health as well as treatment of mental ill health, most commonly using cognitive behavioural therapy, with apps, web-based resources and websites being the most common digital tools.

Results:

The results highlight the over emphasis on convenience sampling with participants mainly recruited from universities or colleges, and the lack of representation from marginalised groups, including LGBTQ+ youth, those from socioeconomically deprived backgrounds, and neurodivergent individuals. Moreover, the focus on anxiety and depression leaves other mental health conditions underrepresented. Retention rates were moderate, indicating room for improvement. There is a need for more research on preventative measures for those aged under 25 years when young people are at increased risk of mental health issues. This includes exploring different intervention approaches and modalities beyond cognitive behaviour therapy and ensuring inclusivity in study populations. Standardising intervention lengths and incorporating long-term follow-up data could provide valuable insights into the efficacy and effectiveness of digital interventions.

Conclusions:

Future studies should aim for greater inclusivity, ensuring representation from marginalised groups to address the diverse mental health needs of young people effectively. By adopting these approaches, digital mental health interventions can become more accessible, engaging, and impactful for young people worldwide.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Potts C, Kealy C, McNulty J, Madrid-Cagigal A, Wilson T, Mulvenna M, O'Neill S, Donohoe G, Barry M

Digital Mental Health Interventions for Young People Aged 16-25 Years: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72892

DOI: 10.2196/72892

PMID: 40344661

PMCID: 12102633

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.