Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Feb 15, 2025
Date Accepted: May 16, 2025
Enhancing surgical safety and efficiency: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of surgical data recorders
ABSTRACT
Background:
Recently surgical data recorders comparable to flight data recorders also known as black boxes in the aviation industry have been developed to improve patient safety and performance in surgery. These devices allow for unique insights in the operating room by providing new data capture capabilities. No systematic review has been carried out to evaluate the areas of application of surgical data recorders to date.
Objective:
This systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis aimed to assess which aspects of the operating theatre environment surgical data recorders are used for. And to make a preliminary assessment of the quantifiable data that can be collected compared to traditional collection methods.
Methods:
The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase and Web of Science databases were lastly systematically searched for papers that focused on a clinical use case for surgical data recorders on February 10th 2025. Not relevant papers in particular papers focusing on implementation of surgical data recorders were excluded. Title, abstract and full-text screening were completed to identify relevant articles. The included studies were analyzed descriptively using data extraction forms. Where possible, quantifiable data was also analyzed. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool.
Results:
70 studies were screened and a total of 17 studies were included. Ten of the 17 studies had a low overall risk of bias; however, confounding, selection bias, small sample sizes, short study periods, and potential Hawthorne effects were notable limitations. Only 2 studies were assessed to have publication bias. Use cases could be grouped into four categories: economic, safety, behaviour in the OR and technical skill assessment. A single-arm meta-analysis focusing on adverse events and distractions in the operating theatre could be conducted, demonstrating accurate reporting of distractions in line with the existing literature.
Conclusions:
Surgical data recorders provide an unobstructed view of various aspects of the operating theatre. Most published papers present preliminary studies on surgical data recorders, indicating the potential for further, larger-scale studies with enhanced methodological quality. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO, CRD42024527164, Registered on April 1st, 2024.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.