Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2025
Date Accepted: Jun 30, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Exploring the Acceptability of Web-Based Health Modalities in Individuals With Hypertension: Qualitative Study

Banjo HP, Stoutenberg M, McNulty LK, Spears D, Ware LJ

Exploring the Acceptability of Web-Based Health Modalities in Individuals With Hypertension: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72568

DOI: 10.2196/72568

PMID: 40854304

PMCID: 12377872

Exploring the acceptability of virtual health modalities in individuals with hypertension: A qualitative study.

  • Hillary Pelumi Banjo; 
  • Mark Stoutenberg; 
  • Lia K. McNulty; 
  • Deja Spears; 
  • Lisa J. Ware

ABSTRACT

Background:

Hypertension is a significant public health concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where access to care is crucial for effective treatment and control. Virtual health modalities provide a promising solution to overcome barriers to care, particularly in under-resourced communities if those communities engage with the technology.

Objective:

To examine the perceptions and experiences of utilizing virtual health modalities for health care access among community members with or at high risk for hypertension.

Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were completed with individuals randomly selected from a sample of community members in Soweto, South Africa previously screened as having either elevated (systolic BP≥120-139 mmHg or diastolic BP≥80-89 mmHg) or high (systolic BP≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP≥90 mmHg) BP to determine if they had any experience of using virtual services and/or what their perceptions were on using such services. An interview script, grounded in the extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) model, was used to guide the interviews. Deductive thematic analysis was used to code the interviews and identify common themes.

Results:

A total of 178 community members (n=104 elevated BP; n=74 high BP) were randomly selected and invited to participate in the study. Forty interviews were conducted with individuals from the elevated (n=20) and high (n=20) BP groups. Four major themes emerged from the interviews regarding using technology to receive healthcare services: 1) trust and credibility of health professionals in a virtual environment, 2) comfort level using technology to receive healthcare, 3) past experiences using technology to receive healthcare, and 4) preference for in-person vs virtual interactions.

Conclusions:

Despite being open and receptive towards the use of virtual health modalities to receive health care, participants preferred in-person interactions due to both a lack of experience using virtual health care and familiarity with traditional in-person health services. Further research is needed to understand how technology may aid future hypertension management efforts in urban African communities.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Banjo HP, Stoutenberg M, McNulty LK, Spears D, Ware LJ

Exploring the Acceptability of Web-Based Health Modalities in Individuals With Hypertension: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72568

DOI: 10.2196/72568

PMID: 40854304

PMCID: 12377872

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.