Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Aging (no longer under consideration since Jun 05, 2025)

Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 20, 2025 - Apr 17, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Risk of Bradycardia and Syncope Associated with the Use of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Chijioke Okeke; 
  • Tenia Slade; 
  • Sarah Beth Tucker; 
  • Olivia Whitworth; 
  • Amey Rane; 
  • Bryan Love; 
  • Ibraheem Karaye; 
  • Saud Alsahali; 
  • Nasim Maleki; 
  • Nawaf Alotaibi; 
  • Douglas Thornton; 
  • Ismaeel Yunusa

ABSTRACT

Background:

In some cases, cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) can amplify the effect of acetylcholine on vagal stimulation of the heart, which may lead to syncope and bradycardia. Available evidence does not definitively establish this association, and therefore clinicians may be unaware of it.

Objective:

To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of the risk of bradycardia and syncope in patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) treated with ChEIs.

Methods:

Our data sources were PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and reference lists of relevant articles. Databases were searched from inception to June 15, 2024. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies (cohort and case-control studies). Three reviewers independently extracted data per PRISMA recommendations and assessed the quality of each study with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute quality assessment tools. We used random-effects modeling to estimate pooled relative risks (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The outcomes examined were bradycardia and syncope.

Results:

Twenty-five independent studies (sixteen RCTs, seven cohorts, one case-control, one pragmatic trial; n=258,388) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis out of the original 310 studies identified. The median reported age in the studies included was 76.3 years (range from 70 to 89.2). In most studies (18 out of 25), more than half of the individuals were female. Additionally, 18 (72%) of the studies included patients with Alzheimer’s disease. The overall absolute risk of bradycardia was 4.63% (95% CI, 1.80-8.55%; 16 studies, n=97,165), and that of syncope was 2.31% (95% CI, 1.18-3.77%; 16 studies, n= 134,162). Use of ChEIs in patients with ADRD was significantly associated with increased risk of bradycardia (RR: 1.23 [95% CI: 1.14-1.33]; 6 studies, n=97,396) and syncope (RR: 1.40 [95% CI: 1.20-1.64]; 9 studies, n=85,169) compared to non-use.

Conclusions:

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that patients with ADRD treated with ChEIs have an increased risk of bradycardia and syncope. Therefore, clinicians should consider the risk of bradycardia and syncope against the benefits of ChEIs when treating patients with ADRD.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Okeke C, Slade T, Tucker SB, Whitworth O, Rane A, Love B, Karaye I, Alsahali S, Maleki N, Alotaibi N, Thornton D, Yunusa I

Risk of Bradycardia and Syncope Associated with the Use of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Preprints. 12/02/2025:72510

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.72510

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/72510

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.