Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Feb 11, 2025
Date Accepted: May 28, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Manual Versus Instrumental Rotation of the Fetal Head in Malposition at Birth (ROTATE Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Parris D, Napolitano R, Bishop J, Briley A, Butler L, Cheed V, David AL, Habib Z, Hardy P, Hinshaw K, Jones LL, Lillywhite R, Molloy E, Nicholls J, O'Brien S, Plachcinski R, Shennan A, Simpson N, Treadwell M, Wattar B, Weeks A, The ROTATE Study Group , Siassakos D

Manual Versus Instrumental Rotation of the Fetal Head in Malposition at Birth (ROTATE Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e72505

DOI: 10.2196/72505

PMID: 42485079

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

ROTATE: Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial of Manual Versus Instrumental Rotation of the Fetal Head in Malposition at Birth

  • Dawn Parris; 
  • Raffaele Napolitano; 
  • Jonathan Bishop; 
  • Annette Briley; 
  • Laura Butler; 
  • Versha Cheed; 
  • Anna L David; 
  • Zaina Habib; 
  • Pollyanna Hardy; 
  • Kim Hinshaw; 
  • Laura L Jones; 
  • Rachel Lillywhite; 
  • Eleanor Molloy; 
  • Jacqueline Nicholls; 
  • Stephen O'Brien; 
  • Rachel Plachcinski; 
  • Andrew Shennan; 
  • Nigel Simpson; 
  • Maureen Treadwell; 
  • Bassel Wattar; 
  • Andrew Weeks; 
  • The ROTATE Study Group; 
  • Dimitrios Siassakos

ABSTRACT

Background Approximately 5% of women will be affected by fetal malposition at full cervical dilatation, with the occiput in transverse or posterior positions. These women are more likely to require assistance to give birth to their babies with either rotational vaginal birth or caesarean birth at full dilatation. Three different rotational methods can be used: rotational (Kielland’s) forceps, rotational vacuum, and manual rotation. Current evidence supporting the use of the three rotational methods is only from observational data. To date, no randomised controlled trial of rotational methods has been completed. Methods and analysis ROTATE is a pragmatic, multi-centre, two-arm parallel group, open-label randomised controlled trial of manual versus instrumental rotation of the fetal head in malposition at birth with an internal pilot and an embedded qualitative process evaluation. The primary outcome is to evaluate whether manual versus instrumental rotation at full cervical dilatation reduces the risk of severe perineal trauma (superiority outcome), defined as a third or fourth degree tear, without substantially increasing the risk of caesarean birth at full dilatation (non-inferiority co-primary outcome). A sample size calculation found that 4988 participants are required to detect a clinically meaningful reduction of third- or fourth-degree tears from 6% to 4% with 90% power (alpha 0.05). A total sample size of 5200 participants from approximately 40 sites is anticipated, as loss to follow-up is expected to be about 4%. Neonatal trauma, a composite of potential outcomes relating to intrapartum hypoxia and physical trauma, is a safety signal. The setting is NHS consultant-led maternity units across the UK. Randomisation is performed after eligibility has been confirmed and verbal consent has been obtained. Randomisation is undertaken via a 24-hour telephone service or online system. Participants are randomised at an individual level on a 1:1 ratio to manual or instrumental (forceps/vacuum) rotation. Written consent is sought postnatally. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was granted from London – Surrey Research Ethics Committee, REC reference 22/LO/0157 from 19th May 2022. There are plans for dissemination of the vital findings of this study in peer-reviewed journals, international conferences and into national courses on assisted vaginal birth in the UK including ROBuST (RCOG Operative Birth Simulation Training). Trial Registration and Status ROTATE protocol version 5.0, dated 15/12/2023. The pilot opened and the first participants was recruited in September 2022. The trial closes on 3rd February 2025. Trial registration does not collect items from the World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set


 Citation

Please cite as:

Parris D, Napolitano R, Bishop J, Briley A, Butler L, Cheed V, David AL, Habib Z, Hardy P, Hinshaw K, Jones LL, Lillywhite R, Molloy E, Nicholls J, O'Brien S, Plachcinski R, Shennan A, Simpson N, Treadwell M, Wattar B, Weeks A, The ROTATE Study Group , Siassakos D

Manual Versus Instrumental Rotation of the Fetal Head in Malposition at Birth (ROTATE Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e72505

DOI: 10.2196/72505

PMID: 42485079

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.