Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 11, 2025
Date Accepted: May 5, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effect of Virtual Reality–Based Therapies on Lower Limb Functional Recovery in Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lu W, Shi M, Liu L, Wang S, Deng W, Ma Y, Wang Y

Effect of Virtual Reality–Based Therapies on Lower Limb Functional Recovery in Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72364

DOI: 10.2196/72364

PMID: 40737641

PMCID: 12310189

Effect of Virtual Reality-Based Therapies on Lower Limb Functional Recovery in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Wenxin Lu; 
  • Minglei Shi; 
  • Lu Liu; 
  • Shu Wang; 
  • Wuquan Deng; 
  • Yu Ma; 
  • Yanzhong Wang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Virtual reality (VR) therapy has gained attention as a promising intervention in stroke rehabilitation, particularly for its potential to enhance motor function and promote neuroplasticity. However, its specific effects on balance, mobility, and gait remain underexplored.

Objective:

This review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of VR therapy on the recovery of lower limb function in stroke survivors.

Methods:

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VR therapy with conventional therapy were eligible for inclusion. All studies were identified through Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (up to July 2024). The primary outcomes included balance, assessed using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and mobility, measured with the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and 10-Meter Walk Test (10-MWT). RevMan 5.4 software was used for the meta-analysis.

Results:

A total of 2145 studies were screened, and 24 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria were included, involving 768 participants. Meta-analysis results showed that VR therapy, compared to conventional therapy, significantly improved BBS (MD 3.29, 95% CI [0.52 to 6.06]; P = 0.02) and TUG (MD -1.67, 95% CI [-2.89 to -0.46]; P = 0.007). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in 10-MWT (MD -0.91, 95% CI [-3.33, 1.50]; P = 0.46). In the subgroup analyses, significant improvements in balance and mobility were observed in patients receiving greater than or equal to 20 sessions, with BBS improved by 5.14 points (95% CI [0.43 to 9.85]; P = 0.03) and TUG reduced by 1.98 seconds (95% CI [-3.33 to -0.63]; P = 0.004). In addition, patients who received VR therapy more than six months after stroke showed greater improvements in BBS (MD 1.64, 95% CI [0.14 to 3.14]; P = 0.03), compared to those who received VR therapy between 7 days and 6 months after stroke.

Conclusions:

Long-term virtual reality-based exercises were more effective in improving functional ability after stroke. VR therapy has demonstrated significant potential for improving lower limb function among stroke patients, particularly when applied with higher frequencies.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lu W, Shi M, Liu L, Wang S, Deng W, Ma Y, Wang Y

Effect of Virtual Reality–Based Therapies on Lower Limb Functional Recovery in Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72364

DOI: 10.2196/72364

PMID: 40737641

PMCID: 12310189

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.