Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Feb 10, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 8, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Social Justice Approach to Assistive Technology and Well-Being of People With Visual Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Qualitative Narrative Study

Ortiz-Escobar LM, Chavarria MA, Hurst-Majno S, Campo Salazar OI, Escobar-Hurtado C, Stein MA, Rivas Velarde M

A Social Justice Approach to Assistive Technology and Well-Being of People With Visual Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Qualitative Narrative Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2026;13:e72306

DOI: 10.2196/72306

PMID: 41950357

A Social Justice Approach to Assistive Technology and Well-Being of People with Visual disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Study

  • Luisa Maria Ortiz-Escobar; 
  • Mario Andres Chavarria; 
  • Samia Hurst-Majno; 
  • Oscar Ivan Campo Salazar; 
  • Celia Escobar-Hurtado; 
  • Michael Ashley Stein; 
  • Minerva Rivas Velarde

ABSTRACT

Background:

The United Nations' third Sustainable Development Goal aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being (WB) for all, which requires effective assistive technology (AT) for persons with disabilities (PwD). However, access to AT is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and high abandonment rates indicate that current solutions often fail to meet users' needs. Understanding the true needs of users and the impact of AT on their WB is crucial to improving its design and effectiveness.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore the role of technology in creating opportunities and barriers in the daily lives of PwVD in LMICs, and how technology affects their WB.

Methods:

Nineteen adults with visual disability participated voluntarily. The study used qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews and focus group. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed applying Deductive qualitative analysis (DQA) in the light of Capability Approach and Disadvantage Theory (DT) frameworks.

Results:

We identified the key functionings participants value in a good life, noting that many of these remain insecure, with some even constituting corrosive disadvantages (e.g., affiliation, employment, and mobility). Additionally, we found fertile functionings such as sport and work. Technology plays a role in enhancing participants' WB by enabling natural, human, and fluid interactions.

Conclusions:

While participants' lives may not fully align with their ideal WB, technology offers potential to help bridge this gap. In-depth studies of disability experiences and the application of social justice frameworks can provide valuable insights for developing more effective, inclusive, and contextually relevant technologies.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ortiz-Escobar LM, Chavarria MA, Hurst-Majno S, Campo Salazar OI, Escobar-Hurtado C, Stein MA, Rivas Velarde M

A Social Justice Approach to Assistive Technology and Well-Being of People With Visual Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Qualitative Narrative Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2026;13:e72306

DOI: 10.2196/72306

PMID: 41950357

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.