Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Infodemiology
Date Submitted: Feb 5, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 30, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Current approaches to, and implementation of information environment assessments in the context of public health: A rapid review
ABSTRACT
Background:
With the advances in digital information sharing channels, democratization of content and access, as well as social shifts in information exchange, we live in increasingly complex information environments. How people process and manage this is layered with multiple determinants which can impact on information seeking, health behaviours and public health. Understanding the dynamics of the information environment in priority populations and its impact on communities and individuals is critical for those working in public health and health emergencies
Objective:
This study aimed to provide an overview of the approaches to, and implementation of information environment assessments as they relate to public health and health emergencies.
Methods:
We conducted a rapid scoping review of the approaches to, and implementation of information environment assessments. The search followed guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute on conducting systematic scoping reviews and our reporting is in-line with the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. We included both academic and grey literature in the English language. As this is an emerging field, an additional step involved input from an informal expert group to identify any further tools or approaches. Studies that assessed, described or discussed approaches to assessing the information environment were included. We excluded papers where the information environment was not the primary focus, or the focus was on individual components only. Two authors independently screened results for inclusion.
Results:
A total of 17 publications were identified through the structured literature and online searches, with an additional five sourced from the informal expert group. The review highlighted significant variety in the breadth and number of domains covered in an assessment, including information needs, seeking, access, production, engagement, information quality and reach. Some assessments adopted a comprehensive, systems-oriented approach, examining factors influencing information beyond the individual level to encompass broader systemic dynamics, while others were significantly narrower in scope.
Conclusions:
The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified interest in understanding how the information environment shapes people’s access to, engagement with, and ability to act on health information. Assessing the information environment is a critical step in identifying and understanding barriers and facilitators that impact different populations. However, a universally accepted approach for such assessment is currently lacking. This paper contributes to the literature by synthesizing current knowledge on assessment tools and frameworks, providing a foundation for future research and development in this area.
Citation