Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 29, 2025
Date Accepted: May 27, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

eHealth Literacy and Participation in Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Patients With Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study

Eze CE, Dorsch MP, Coe AB, Lester CA, Buis LR, Farris KB

eHealth Literacy and Participation in Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Patients With Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71926

DOI: 10.2196/71926

PMID: 40743532

PMCID: 12314467

Electronic Health Literacy and Participation in Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring among Patients with Hypertension: A Cross-sectional Study

  • Chinwe E Eze; 
  • Michael P Dorsch; 
  • Antoinette B Coe; 
  • Corey A Lester; 
  • Lorraine R Buis; 
  • Karen B Farris

ABSTRACT

Background:

The ability to participate in digital health services such as remote blood pressure (BP) monitoring needs digital skills and knowledge known as electronic health literacy (e-HL). However, e-HL is rarely studied among those participating in remote BP monitoring (RBPM).

Objective:

This study assessed e-HL levels among participants with hypertension (HTN) and determined the e-HL domains that predict participation in RBPM. This study provides important focus areas to increase RBPM participation.

Methods:

This study was a quantitative, cross-sectional survey of people with HTN in the United States. The survey included demographics, RBPM participation questions, and the e-HL questionnaire (eHLQ) for assessment of e-HL. The eHLQ is a 35-item, 7-domain validated questionnaire including 1. Ability to process information, 2. Engagement in own health, 3. Ability to actively engage with digital services, 4. Feel safe and in control, 5. Motivated to engage with digital services, 6. Access to digital services that work, and 7. Digital services that suit individual needs. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the participants’ demographics and e-HL status. Chi-square tests were used to compare participants’ characteristics between RBPM and non-RBPM groups. The Mann-Whitney U test compared the e-HL domain scores in RBPM and non-RBPM groups. Firth’s logistic regression was used to predict participation in RBPM. The dependent variable was participation in RBPM. The independent variables were demographics and e-HL domains.

Results:

A total of 507 people with HTN participated in the survey. Sixty participants were currently participating in RBPM, giving a prevalence of 11.8% (60/507). The mean age of RBPM participants was 46.2 years (SD 14.7) and non-RBPM was 62 years (SD 13.7), P < .001. The e-HL scores in all 7 domains were significantly higher for the RBPM group than the non-RBPM group. Among the e-HL domains, higher scores in digital services that suit individual needs (domain 7) were the only predictor of RBPM participation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.84, 95% CI 1.002 – 8.84) considering age, sex, and race variables.

Conclusions:

Participation in RBPM is likely to increase with increase in digital services that are tailored to individual patients’ needs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Eze CE, Dorsch MP, Coe AB, Lester CA, Buis LR, Farris KB

eHealth Literacy and Participation in Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Patients With Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71926

DOI: 10.2196/71926

PMID: 40743532

PMCID: 12314467

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.