Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 21, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 21, 2025 - Mar 18, 2025
Date Accepted: May 23, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Remote Patient Monitoring System for Polypathological Older Adults at High Risk for Hospitalization: Retrospective Cohort Study

Testa D, Salma I, Iborra V, Roussel V, Dutech M, Minvielle E, Cabanes E

Remote Patient Monitoring System for Polypathological Older Adults at High Risk for Hospitalization: Retrospective Cohort Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71527

DOI: 10.2196/71527

PMID: 40658993

PMCID: 12279313

Remote Patient Monitoring System for Polypathological Older Adults at High Risk for Hospitalization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Damien Testa; 
  • Israa Salma; 
  • Vincent Iborra; 
  • Victoire Roussel; 
  • Mireille Dutech; 
  • Etienne Minvielle; 
  • Elise Cabanes

ABSTRACT

Background:

Healthcare systems are increasingly confronted by the challenge posed by the aging population. In particular, hospitalization, both initial and subsequent, is often observed among the polypathological elderly, while it is estimated that over 30% of such hospitalizations could be avoided. In this context, remote patient monitoring (RPM) systems offer a promising solution, enabling early detection and management of patient complexity.

Objective:

This study aims to provide a complementary analysis of the impact of the EPOCA RPM system for polypathological elderly people, on the total number of unplanned hospitalization days and admissions, as well as emergency department (ED) visits. In an earlier study, we evaluated the EPOCA PRM system when the system operator is a geriatrician; in the current one, we evaluate the case when the general practitioner (GP) is the operator.

Methods:

A retrospective, before-and-after cohort design was used for the purposes of this study. Patients who benefited from the EPOCA RPM system for more than one year (between February 2022 and August 2024), aged over 70 and with two or more pathologies were included in the analysis. We compared the total number of unplanned hospital admissions, hospitalization days and ED visits between the previous year (Y-1) and the year (Y) of follow-up by the EPOCA RPM system. Statistical analyses were significant at P-value < .05

Results:

A total of 80 patients were included, with an average age of 87. Our study showed a significant reduction in hospitalization days by 49% between Y-1 and Y. There was also a significant decrease in the number of unplanned hospital admissions (-57%) and ED visits (-62%). These results were seen by a significant decrease from 0.99 to 0.42 per patient in the number of hospitalizations, from 0.99 to 0.37 in emergency room visits and a reduction of 9.7 hospital days per year per patient, P-value< .001. In addition, there was no observed increase in mortality or transfers to intensive care units

Conclusions:

The results of this study support our earlier findings on the potential benefits of EPOCA RPM for managing complex, polypathological elderly patients, this time with the GP as system operator. RPM systems can support GPs and caregivers manage complex geriatric patient care, help reduce healthcare costs and the burden on hospital services, while enabling patients to remain safely at home. Further evidence on the effectiveness of EPOCA RPM system may be obtained in a future large randomized controlled trial


 Citation

Please cite as:

Testa D, Salma I, Iborra V, Roussel V, Dutech M, Minvielle E, Cabanes E

Remote Patient Monitoring System for Polypathological Older Adults at High Risk for Hospitalization: Retrospective Cohort Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71527

DOI: 10.2196/71527

PMID: 40658993

PMCID: 12279313

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.