Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jan 15, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 14, 2025 - Mar 11, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 4, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
A Causal Artificial Intelligence Recommendation System for Digital Mental Health: Bayesian Decision-Theoretic Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Digital mental health tools promise to enhance the reach and quality of care. Current tools often provide interventional recommendations to individuals, typically using generic rule-based systems or predictive artificial intelligence. However, interventional recommendations require causal considerations to compare future outcomes under different interventions.
Objective:
Here we develop CAIRS, a causal artificial intelligence recommendation system that uses an individual’s current presentation, their preferences, and the learned dynamics between domains to identify and rank interventions.
Methods:
We frame the recommendation problem within a Bayesian decision-theoretic framework, whereby a preference ordering of decisions can be estimated using the expected utility of outcomes under interventions. The causal processes are assumed to follow a structural causal model, where we learn the posterior distribution of causal structures from observational data using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Expected utilities under interventions are then estimated using a do-operation, which passes through the effects of changing a variable on the outcomes, while accounting for confounders. We apply our approach to rank domains relating to mental health and wellbeing as intervention targets for adults (N=619) that used the Innowell Fitness app between September 2021 to September 2023 and completed a questionnaire at two timepoints (1 week - 6 months from baseline).
Results:
Psychological distress had the most prominent effects on other domains with paths to personal functioning (ppath=86%), social support (ppath=92%), sleep (ppath=88%), and physical activity (ppath=86%). Optimal interventions weighted in accordance with the probability of the baseline presentation were personal functioning (popt=30%), psychological distress (popt=29%), social support (popt=18%), nutrition (popt=9.6%), substance use (popt=6.7%), sleep (popt=4.5%), and physical activity (popt=2.2%). Psychological distress was typically the optimal intervention target in complex cases where multiple domains were unhealthy at baseline, due to its wide-ranging effects on multiple domains.
Conclusions:
This work illustrates the incorporation of causality and decision-making principles for an automated system to personalise interventions for digital mental health tools.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.