Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jan 16, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 30, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effects of Choice Set Sizes and Moderations of Anxiety and State Emotions on Mental Health Self-Care Uptake, Engagement, and User Experience: Experimental Study

Yeung SK, Leung FHT, Lee JCM, Cheung GMH, Li CW, Mak WWS

Effects of Choice Set Sizes and Moderations of Anxiety and State Emotions on Mental Health Self-Care Uptake, Engagement, and User Experience: Experimental Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e71165

DOI: 10.2196/71165

PMID: 41397229

PMCID: 12705060

Effects of Choice Set Sizes and Moderations of Anxiety and State Emotions on Mental Health Self-Care Uptake, Engagement, and User Experience: An Experimental Study

  • Siu Kit Yeung; 
  • Florence H. T. Leung; 
  • Jason C. M. Lee; 
  • Gabriel Man Hin Cheung; 
  • Ching Wan Li; 
  • Winnie W. S. Mak

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital mental health platforms often consist of many different types of self-care exercises. Whether a high number of choices may backfire and pose negative consequences (i.e., not choosing any exercises, choice dissatisfaction) to individuals, especially those experiencing anxiety and depressive symptoms and unpleasant state emotions have not been empirically investigated, to the best of our knowledge.

Objective:

The present study investigated the impact of choice set size on practice decisions, completion, satisfaction, and subjective experiences, as well as potential moderators including depression and anxiety symptoms, state emotions, and trait-level motivational and decisional characteristics on these choice outcomes.

Methods:

Participants were recruited through university mass email and social media, and 652 participants were included in our analyses. Participants completed questions regarding anxiety and depressive symptoms, state emotions, and other trait-level characteristics. Then, they were randomly assigned to 1-choice, 4-choice, and 16-choice conditions, in which they may choose a self-care activity to practice or decide not to practice. Finally, they completed questions regarding completion, satisfaction, engagement, attitude, and perceived improvement in psychological state.

Results:

Presenting multiple choices resulted in a higher likelihood of practice and better decision satisfaction compared to presenting with a single choice. Anxiety symptoms and state emotions may be key moderators. Specifically, for individuals with more anxiety symptoms and intense negative emotions, presenting a larger choice set (16 choices) resulted in more positive chosen exercise satisfaction, better attitudes towards chosen activity, and higher perceived improvement in mental health state after the activity, when compared to presenting with smaller choice sets. No evidence was found for moderating effect of trait-level characteristics.

Conclusions:

The moderation results found in the present study were contradictory to our hypotheses and prior articles. We speculated a possible reason for these findings may be that people with more anxiety symptoms and unpleasant emotions may have stronger need to reduce these uncomfortable symptoms and emotions, and by presenting with more choices on self-care activities, they may pose a higher possibility that these self-care activities can address their distress. Clinical Trial: Open Science Framework puwxb; https://osf.io/puwxb/ (Note: This is not a clinical trial, but an experiment)


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yeung SK, Leung FHT, Lee JCM, Cheung GMH, Li CW, Mak WWS

Effects of Choice Set Sizes and Moderations of Anxiety and State Emotions on Mental Health Self-Care Uptake, Engagement, and User Experience: Experimental Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e71165

DOI: 10.2196/71165

PMID: 41397229

PMCID: 12705060

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.