Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Aug 20, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 31, 2025
Date Submitted to PubMed: Oct 31, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing Usefulness of the Dashboard Instrument to Review Equity (DIRE) Checklist to Evaluate Equity in Public Health Dashboards: Reliability Study

Sosa P, Syailendra EA, Lehmann HP, Kharrazi H

Assessing Usefulness of the Dashboard Instrument to Review Equity (DIRE) Checklist to Evaluate Equity in Public Health Dashboards: Reliability Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e71094

DOI: 10.2196/71094

PMID: 41171300

PMCID: 12677865

Assessing Usefulness of the DIRE Checklist to Evaluate Equity in Public Health Dashboards: A Reliability Study

  • Paulina Sosa; 
  • Emir Amaro Syailendra; 
  • Harold P. Lehmann; 
  • Hadi Kharrazi

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed considerable public health equity challenges. Although dashboards remained a critical source of health information for decision makers, key gaps in equity-based decision support were revealed. In prior research, the Dashboard Instrument to Review Equity (DIRE) checklist was developed and refined to be a practical tool for public health departments to use in evaluating equity-based decision support mechanisms in their dashboards.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to measure the reliability of the DIRE checklist as a practical instrument for data practitioners to evaluate dashboards.

Methods:

Multiple steps were completed to measure the reliability of the DIRE checklist. At first, specific parameters were used to select a sample of U.S. state-based dashboards (n=26). Two reviewers then applied the DIRE checklist to each dashboard. Three different methods were used to assess DIRE checklist’s reliability: inter-rater agreement, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), and the cosine similarity. These methods were applied to different scores captured by the DIRE checklist (i.e., an overall checklist score, category-specific scores, and a subjective reviewer score). Finally, qualitative notes captured by the reviewers were assessed using a thematic analysis approach.

Results:

A total of 26 dashboards were evaluated using the DIRE checklist by two reviewers. The overall percentage comparison for the overall checklist scores were 31.7% and 41.8%, resulting in a percentage agreement of 72.7% among reviewers. Most of the categories scored less than 50% by the reviewers; however, these scores showed substantial to high agreement across most categories within each DIRE checklist category, with absolute percentage agreement being more than 55% for most categories. The ICC of the category-specific scores resulted in varying levels of agreement across different categories (i.e., ICC3k ranging from 0 to 0.74). The average subjective reviewer score was 9.24 out of a maximum score of 13.

Conclusions:

The study results confirm an acceptable level of reliability for the DIRE checklist to measure health equity representation in public health dashboards. The DIRE checklist can assist public health data practitioners in integrating equity-focused functionalities and decision support in dashboard design and development.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sosa P, Syailendra EA, Lehmann HP, Kharrazi H

Assessing Usefulness of the Dashboard Instrument to Review Equity (DIRE) Checklist to Evaluate Equity in Public Health Dashboards: Reliability Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e71094

DOI: 10.2196/71094

PMID: 41171300

PMCID: 12677865

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.