Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Jan 3, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 3, 2025 - Feb 28, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 28, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: Qualitative Thematic Analysis

Yung A, Shaw T, Kay J, Janssen A

Examining How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: Qualitative Thematic Analysis

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e70827

DOI: 10.2196/70827

PMID: 40499161

PMCID: 12198703

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Towards Understanding How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis

  • Alan Yung; 
  • Tim Shaw; 
  • Judy Kay; 
  • Anna Janssen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Commonly used digital health technologies, such as electronic health record systems (EHRs) and patient portals, as well as custom built digital decision aids, have the potential to enhance person-centered shared decision-making (SDM) in cancer care. However, there is little evidence in the literature on how these technologies are used for SDM or how best they can be designed and integrated into workflows and practice. This may be due to the nature of SDM, which is fundamentally human interactions and conversations that produce desired human outcomes. Technology must, therefore, be non-intrusive while supporting the human decision-making process.

Objective:

This study examined how digital technologies can help cancer care professionals improve shared decision-making (SDM) in oncology consultations.

Methods:

Healthcare professionals who treat cancer patients in Sydney, Australia, were invited to participate in online co-design focus group meetings. During these sessions, they shared their experiences using digital technologies for shared decision-making (SDM) and provided suggestions to improve their use of digital technologies. The session recordings were transcribed and then analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis.

Results:

The findings indicated that various digital technologies, such as electronic health record systems (EHRs), mobile devices, and patient portals, are used by cancer care professionals to help improve patients’ understanding of their disease and available care options. Digital technologies can both improve and undermine SDM. Current systems are generally not designed to support SDM. Key issues such as data integration and interoperability between systems negatively impact the ability of digital technologies to support SDM. Emerging technologies such as Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) were discussed as potential facilitators of SDM by automating the gathering and sharing of information with patients and between health professionals.

Conclusions:

This research indicates that digital technologies have the potential to impact SDM in oncology consultations. However, this potential has not yet been fully realized, and significant modifications are required to optimize their usefulness in person-centered SDM.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yung A, Shaw T, Kay J, Janssen A

Examining How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: Qualitative Thematic Analysis

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e70827

DOI: 10.2196/70827

PMID: 40499161

PMCID: 12198703

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.