Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Dec 17, 2024
Date Accepted: Jun 16, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparison of 5-Day Multidaily Neuronavigated Theta-Burst Sessions With 6-Week Standard Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (the Dutch Depression Outcome Trial): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Dols A, Biemans T, Coomans C, van Eijndhoven P, Dalhuisen I, van der Werf YD, Vriend C, Gomes E, Sack AT, Schuhmann T, Chaudry M, Arns M, Walters BH, Wijnen B, Zalesky A, Cash R, Blumberger DM, Scheepstra KW, Hoogendoorn AW, van den Heuvel OA, van Exel E, The D-DOTT Consortium

Comparison of 5-Day Multidaily Neuronavigated Theta-Burst Sessions With 6-Week Standard Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (the Dutch Depression Outcome Trial): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e70121

DOI: 10.2196/70121

PMID: 40840870

PMCID: 12411794

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Dutch-Depression Outcome trial comparing 5- day multi-daily neuronavigated Theta burst sessions with 6 weeks standard rTMS (D-DOTT study): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Annemiek Dols; 
  • Tom Biemans; 
  • Coen Coomans; 
  • Philip van Eijndhoven; 
  • Iris Dalhuisen; 
  • Ysbrand D van der Werf; 
  • Chris Vriend; 
  • Elvira Gomes; 
  • Alexander T Sack; 
  • Teresa Schuhmann; 
  • Mashood Chaudry; 
  • Martijn Arns; 
  • Bethany Hipple Walters; 
  • Ben Wijnen; 
  • Andrew Zalesky; 
  • Robin Cash; 
  • Daniel M Blumberger; 
  • Karel WF Scheepstra; 
  • Adriaan W Hoogendoorn; 
  • Odile A van den Heuvel; 
  • Eric van Exel; 
  • The D-DOTT Consortium

ABSTRACT

Background:

Novel therapies are crucial for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) since more than 33% of patients do not respond to first-line treatments. A promising novel treatment strategy is an intensive five-day course of Personalised functional connectivity guided Accelerated intermittent Theta burst stimulation (PAiT), modelled after the Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT) protocol . This new form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may lead to higher remission rates in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, it remains unclear how this accelerated strategy compares to the standard once daily 10Hz rTMS at inducing remission of depression.

Objective:

To compare (cost-)effectiveness using the PAiT protocol and the standard 10Hz rTMS, in patients with TRD.

Methods:

108 patients will be enrolled in this multicentre randomized controlled trial. Patients will receive stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex using either the PAiT protocol (5 days of 10 sessions/day, resulting in 50 sessions in total, 90.000 pulses) or the standard 10 Hz rTMS, (once daily during 6 weeks, resulting in 30 sessions in total, 90.000 pulses). Personalised targets will be identified in the aiTBS condition based on negative functional coupling between the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) and the DLPFC. In the rTMS condition, DLPFC target locations are identified using the standard Beam-F3 method . In both conditions, coil placement is performed with neuronavigation, navigating either to the personalised functional connectivity target or the Beam-F3 location. Patients will undergo pre and post-treatment (f)MRI scans including cognitive and emotional tasks, and a behavioral task will be performed outside of the scanner. In addition, during stimulation, heart rate will be measured. There are four follow-up measurements, at 7, 12, 26 and 31 weeks post-baseline. We expect that the PAiT protocol is more (cost-)effective than standard 10 Hz rTMS.

Results:

The results of our study will provide professionals with an adequately powered trial answering whether the PAiT protocol is superior to standard HF-rTMS. In addition, this trial will provide further insights into the underlying mechanisms related to treatment effect, the effects of rTMS/aiTBS on cognitive domains such as executive functioning and emotion, possible differences in side-effects, long-term effects and (contributing factors to) possible relapse.

Conclusions:

To our knowledge, the current study is the first clinical trial to compare the (cost-)effectiveness of PAiT to standard 10Hz rTMS as treatment for patients with TRD. Clinical Trial: This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov with code: NCT05900271, on June 12th 2023.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dols A, Biemans T, Coomans C, van Eijndhoven P, Dalhuisen I, van der Werf YD, Vriend C, Gomes E, Sack AT, Schuhmann T, Chaudry M, Arns M, Walters BH, Wijnen B, Zalesky A, Cash R, Blumberger DM, Scheepstra KW, Hoogendoorn AW, van den Heuvel OA, van Exel E, The D-DOTT Consortium

Comparison of 5-Day Multidaily Neuronavigated Theta-Burst Sessions With 6-Week Standard Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (the Dutch Depression Outcome Trial): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e70121

DOI: 10.2196/70121

PMID: 40840870

PMCID: 12411794

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.