Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Dec 6, 2024
Date Accepted: May 27, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Clinician Needs and Requirements for a Decision Aid Navigator: Qualitative Study

Morse B, Reale C, Nguyen AT, Latella E, Bauguess H, Anders S, Roberts P, SooHoo SL, El-Kareh R, Soares A, Schilling L

Clinician Needs and Requirements for a Decision Aid Navigator: Qualitative Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e69756

DOI: 10.2196/69756

PMID: 40840367

PMCID: 12370259

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Healthcare Provider Needs for a Shared Decision Aid Navigator System (SEDANS): A Qualitative Study

  • Brad Morse; 
  • Carrie Reale; 
  • An T Nguyen; 
  • Erin Latella; 
  • Hannah Bauguess; 
  • Shilo Anders; 
  • Pamela Roberts; 
  • Spencer L SooHoo; 
  • Robert El-Kareh; 
  • Andrey Soares; 
  • Lisa Schilling

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patient decision aid (PDAs) are important tools that support informed decision-making by the patient based on evidence-based treatment options. PDAs can increase patient knowledge, reduce decisional regret, and engage the provider and patient in meaningful dialog. Despite proven effectiveness in enhancing patient-centered care and improve outcomes, a gap remains of implementing PDAs in routine clinical workflows.

Objective:

This qualitative study produced insight into the needs and preferences of health care providers (HCP) using a clinician-facing navigator app that surfaces relevant PDA tools for shared decision making. The Navigator app is a component of the Shared Decision Aid Navigator System (SEDANS) that is embedded in the electronic health record (EHR).

Methods:

We conducted 13 semi-structured interviews with HCPs who were recruited from four academic medical centers. Interviews included a demonstration of the SEDANS Navigator app. Questions focused on HCP needs and requirements, the clinician context of use, and affordances and barriers to using the system. Themes were identified through summative content analysis, consensus coding, and data reduction.

Results:

We identified three themes: (1) Streamlined functionality may simplify workflow and decrease the burden of shared decision-making, (2) Effective use requires HCP to possess appropriate competencies to use both the Navigator and relevant PDAs, and (3) HCP trust in the Navigator is required to subsequently build patient trust in PDAs. HCPs unanimously shared that SEDANS Navigator should be integrated into the existing workflow. To accomplish this clear priority, clinicians stated that they needed the requisite competencies to successfully use the tool and build trust both with the tool itself and with the patients who would potentially benefit from the use of PDAs and the shared decision-making interaction.

Conclusions:

Tools designed and developed to support PDA use must be integrated into the existing workflow efficiently to create an opportunity for uptake of the technology by busy HCPs. If the SEDANS Navigator can operationalize the cumbersome process of documenting the use of PDAs, more HCPs may potentially use PDAs with their patients, given the right context and appropriate PDA.  


 Citation

Please cite as:

Morse B, Reale C, Nguyen AT, Latella E, Bauguess H, Anders S, Roberts P, SooHoo SL, El-Kareh R, Soares A, Schilling L

Clinician Needs and Requirements for a Decision Aid Navigator: Qualitative Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e69756

DOI: 10.2196/69756

PMID: 40840367

PMCID: 12370259

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.