Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Dec 5, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 3, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Ethics and Equity Challenges in Telerehabilitation for Older Adults: Rapid Review

Veras M, Auger LP, Sigouin J, Gheidari N, Nelson ML, Miller WC, Hudon A, Kairy D

Ethics and Equity Challenges in Telerehabilitation for Older Adults: Rapid Review

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e69660

DOI: 10.2196/69660

PMID: 40802966

PMCID: 12349735

Ethics and Equity Challenges in Telerehabilitation for Older Adults: A Rapid Review

  • Mirella Veras; 
  • Louis-Pierre Auger; 
  • Jennifer Sigouin; 
  • Nahid Gheidari; 
  • Michelle LA Nelson; 
  • William C Miller; 
  • Anne Hudon; 
  • Dahlia Kairy

ABSTRACT

Background:

The integration of technology in rehabilitation is transforming healthcare delivery for older adults, especially through telerehabilitation, which addresses barriers to in-person care.

Objective:

This rapid review explores the ethical and equity concerns associated with telerehabilitation for older adults, focusing on challenges such as internet access, technology adoption, and digital literacy

Methods:

Methods:

Conducted according to Cochrane Rapid Review guidelines, this review used the Metaverse Equitable Rehabilitation Therapy (MERTH) framework, focusing on equity and ethics. Studies included telerehabilitation services for adults aged 55 and older, published between 2010 and 2023. Screening was conducted independently by two researchers using Rayyan, with full-text review by additional team members. Searches were performed in Medline and Embase

Results:

Results:

From 323 articles retrieved, 50 studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were published between 2013 and 2023, with 55.77% published in 2021. Disparities in socioeconomic status, geographic location, and racial and ethnic backgrounds also impact telerehabilitation utilization. Additionally, ethical concerns around privacy, security, and autonomy are often inadequately addressed.

Conclusions:

This review emphasizes the need for culturally appropriate, accessible, and inclusive telerehabilitation services that integrate ethical and equity considerations into their design and delivery.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Veras M, Auger LP, Sigouin J, Gheidari N, Nelson ML, Miller WC, Hudon A, Kairy D

Ethics and Equity Challenges in Telerehabilitation for Older Adults: Rapid Review

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e69660

DOI: 10.2196/69660

PMID: 40802966

PMCID: 12349735

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.