Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 29, 2024
Date Accepted: Jun 11, 2025
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jun 18, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Differences in Challenges to Using Telehealth Among Older Adult Video and Telephone Users With Frailty: Retrospective Observational Study

Lamba S, Li S, Lamba A, Tang F, Ruiz D, Valencia W, Dang S

Differences in Challenges to Using Telehealth Among Older Adult Video and Telephone Users With Frailty: Retrospective Observational Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69437

DOI: 10.2196/69437

PMID: 40882213

PMCID: 12396796

Telehealth Use Among Frail Older Adults: Differences among Video and Telephone Users

  • Saanvi Lamba; 
  • Shirley Li; 
  • Avi Lamba; 
  • Fei Tang; 
  • Diana Ruiz; 
  • Willy Valencia; 
  • Stuti Dang

ABSTRACT

Background:

The shift to video care during the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated disparities in health care access, especially among frail high-need, high-risk (HNHR) older adults.

Objective:

Our objective was to quantify the ability of HNHR older Veterans to use video visits for healthcare, and identify factors associated with successful video visit completion.

Methods:

Veterans in a VA Frailty Intervention and Treatment (FIT) clinic underwent a physical, functional, psychological, social, and technology assessment at baseline. During the pandemic, the FIT clinic switched to virtual visits. We sorted patients into four groups: video visit, telephone-visit, reached but no visit, and unable to contact. We performed t-test for comparing normal variables, and chi-square test for comparing categorical variables, to identify factors associated with successfully completing a video- vs telephone-visit.

Results:

We attempted to contact 110 FIT clinic patients. They were 73.5 ± 5.6 years old on average, 46 (41.8%) were White, 46 (41.8%) Black, and 17 (15.5%) Hispanic; Sixty-seven (60.9%) had at least some college education, and 49 (44.5%) were very confident filling out medical forms. Of the 110, 72 were reached, and 65 agreed to a virtual visit. Of the 65, 19 (29.2%) patients completed a video visit successfully, while 37 (57%) completed a telephone-visit; 19/25 (76%) of those who scheduled a video visit completed it successfully. Veterans who completed a video visit, compared to the telephone-visit group, were more likely to have access to a computer with a camera and microphone (P=.001) and high-speed internet/data plan (P=.03), use e-mail (P=.02), and be confident in internet use (P=.05). They were more likely to have a higher health literacy score (P=.04) and be cognitively intact with a MoCA score of ≥26 (P=.02), and were less likely to have issues with walking, stepping and balance (P=.03).

Conclusions:

Our study found that competing a video visit requires technology access, ability, and willingness. Among frail older Veterans, only a quarter completed a video visit, and comprised of patients who already had access to video-capable technology, used it, and were comfortable with it. They were also more likely to be physically and cognitively intact than those who used telephone visits. Strategies to expand the use of video visits into the care of older adults should screen older adults to identify those more likely to succeed, and increase access to simple home telehealth technology. Clinical Trial: TBD


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lamba S, Li S, Lamba A, Tang F, Ruiz D, Valencia W, Dang S

Differences in Challenges to Using Telehealth Among Older Adult Video and Telephone Users With Frailty: Retrospective Observational Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69437

DOI: 10.2196/69437

PMID: 40882213

PMCID: 12396796

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.