Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Nov 28, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 14, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Representations of Older Adults’ Digital Literacy in Canadian News Media: Critical Discourse Analysis Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2

Ménard A, Maharaj L, Harb S, Fraser S, O'Sullivan T

Representations of Older Adults’ Digital Literacy in Canadian News Media: Critical Discourse Analysis Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e69373

DOI: 10.2196/69373

PMID: 40882616

PMCID: 12396828

Analyzing Media Narratives of Older Adults in the Digital Age: A Tale of Digital Ageism

  • Alixe Ménard; 
  • Lexi Maharaj; 
  • Sophie Harb; 
  • Sarah Fraser; 
  • Tracey O'Sullivan

ABSTRACT

Background:

The transition of social and health services to digital platforms has significant implications for the inclusion and well-being of older adults. Digital literacy is a key determinant of health and equity, particularly as services shift online. For older adults, this is crucial for accessing essential services and information, especially during disasters, aiding in emergency resource navigation and information access.

Objective:

This study examines how Canadian news media portray older adults’ digital literacy in the context of disaster risk management, utilizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) framework to guide the analysis.

Methods:

News media articles from Canada, published after May 4, 2023, to July 4, 2024, were analyzed. Articles were identified through database searches and manual reviews, with inclusion criteria focusing on mentions of older adults and digital literacy. Critical discourse analysis was conducted using UTAUT2 factors to interpret the media narratives.

Results:

Of the 103 articles reviewed, 55 met the inclusion criteria. Four key themes emerged: (1) Performance and Effort Expectancy: Media frequently depicted older adults as needing significant help with digital technologies, indicating potential digital ageism. (2) Social Influence: Fearmongering narratives suggest insufficient technological skills could result in social exclusion and limited access to essential services. (3) Facilitating Conditions: Articles highlighted older adults' susceptibility to digital scams and fraud, reinforcing digital ageism. (4) Hedonic Motivation: Media portrayals emphasized active aging, illustrating how digital tools, such as home security systems, can enhance independence and quality of life.

Conclusions:

Media narratives on older adults’ digital literacy perpetuate digital ageism. The study highlights how negative portrayals of older adults’ digital skills and their exclusion from disaster preparedness discussions underscores the need for more inclusive media representations. Findings suggest that media outlets could play a crucial role in shifting to more supportive portrayals of older adults’ engagement with technology. Improving media portrayals can enhance digital engagement and preparedness among aging populations, contributing to better disaster response and overall quality of life.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ménard A, Maharaj L, Harb S, Fraser S, O'Sullivan T

Representations of Older Adults’ Digital Literacy in Canadian News Media: Critical Discourse Analysis Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e69373

DOI: 10.2196/69373

PMID: 40882616

PMCID: 12396828

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.