Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Nov 28, 2024
Date Accepted: Sep 16, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Didactic and Content Quality of Basic Life Support Videos on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Study

Sterz J, Beaugé Y, Tueckmantel P, Bepler L, Flinspach AN, Gramlich Y, Verboket R, Bintaro P, Janko M, Flinspach MH, Merker M, Bepler S, Vollrath JT, Voß SH, Ruesseler M

Didactic and Content Quality of Basic Life Support Videos on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e69103

DOI: 10.2196/69103

PMID: 41191922

PMCID: 12588586

Didactic and Content Quality of Basic Life Support Videos on YouTube: A Cross-sectional Study

  • Jasmina Sterz; 
  • Yvonne Beaugé; 
  • Pia Tueckmantel; 
  • Lena Bepler; 
  • Armin N. Flinspach; 
  • Yves Gramlich; 
  • René Verboket; 
  • Philipp Bintaro; 
  • Maren Janko; 
  • Mairen H. Flinspach; 
  • Michael Merker; 
  • Sven Bepler; 
  • Jan T. Vollrath; 
  • Sebastian H. Voß; 
  • Miriam Ruesseler

ABSTRACT

Background:

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is vital for improving patient outcomes in medical emergencies. Both laypersons and healthcare professionals often seek guidance on performing CPR. In today's digital age, many turn to easily accessible platforms like YouTube for practical skills.

Objective:

This study evaluates the didactic and content quality of CPR videos on YouTube using comprehensive checklists and investigates the association between the assigned quality scores and type of publisher, view count, and video rankings.

Methods:

Videos were included based on defined search terms and exclusion criteria. Two emergency physicians rated each video independently using validated checklists concerning content and didactic quality. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the relationships between video quality scores and view counts, as well as video rankings.

Results:

Of the 250 videos identified, 74 met the inclusion criteria. On the content checklist, videos scored an average of 56.5%, and on the didactic checklist, they scored 66.6%. None achieved the maximum score. Videos from official medical institutions scored significantly higher in content quality compared to non-official sources (P = .04). Interestingly, video quality scores showed no association with video rankings or view counts.

Conclusions:

Our study highlights substantial variability in the didactic and content quality of CPR-related videos on YouTube, making it difficult to predict video quality based on likes or search rankings alone. Medical educators should offer clear recommendations for valuable videos, and the creation of new videos should adhere to didactic and content checklists to ensure accuracy and effectiveness.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sterz J, Beaugé Y, Tueckmantel P, Bepler L, Flinspach AN, Gramlich Y, Verboket R, Bintaro P, Janko M, Flinspach MH, Merker M, Bepler S, Vollrath JT, Voß SH, Ruesseler M

Didactic and Content Quality of Basic Life Support Videos on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e69103

DOI: 10.2196/69103

PMID: 41191922

PMCID: 12588586

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.