Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Diabetes

Date Submitted: Nov 15, 2024
Date Accepted: Sep 2, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Coefficient of Variation to Assess the Reproducibility of Meal-Induced Glycemic Responses: Development of a Clustering Algorithm

Lubasinski N, Thabit H, Nutter PW, Petrescu D, Haper S

Coefficient of Variation to Assess the Reproducibility of Meal-Induced Glycemic Responses: Development of a Clustering Algorithm

JMIR Diabetes 2025;10:e68821

DOI: 10.2196/68821

PMID: 41264796

PMCID: 12633838

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Coefficient of Variation to Assess the Reproducibility of Meal-Induced Glycemic Responses

  • Nicole Lubasinski; 
  • Hood Thabit; 
  • Paul W. Nutter; 
  • David Petrescu; 
  • Simon Haper

ABSTRACT

Background:

Managing Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) requires maintaining target blood glucose levels through precise diet and insulin dosing. Predicting postprandial glycemic responses (PPGRs) based solely on carbohydrate content is limited by factors like meal composition, individual physiology, and lifestyle. Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) provide insights into these responses, revealing significant individual variability.

Objective:

The statistical clustering method propsed here balances the number of clusters formed and the glycemic variability of the PPGRs within each cluster to offer a clustering technique on which treatment decisions could be based.

Methods:

Blood glucose (BG) data from the OhioT1DM dataset were to assess clustering of PPGR based on the CV of glucose. Clustering was performed using statistical clustering, with each PPGR isolated into 48 data points per event. A CV threshold of <36% was used to define clinically similar clusters. This aimed to cluster PPGRs with minimal glycemic variability. The approach aims to enhance precision in analyzing postprandial glycemic dynamics, assessing cluster cohesion via standard deviation and CV within meal categories.

Results:

The analysis revealed a reproducible set of PPGR-clusters specific to meal types and individuals (2.4±1.8 for breakfast, 2.7±0.9 for lunch, 3.1±1.0 for dinner), with the number of clusters varying across participants and meals in the dataset. Carbohydrate intake alone did not affect cluster formation, suggesting a complex relationship between meal composition and PPGR variability. However, certain individuals showed significant associations between carbohydrate intake and cluster formation for specific meals.

Conclusions:

The meal-based glycemic clustering algorithm provides a promising framework for predicting PPGRs in people living with T1D (PwT1D), independent of carbohydrate intake. It emphasizes the need for personalized prediction models to optimize TIR and enhance diabetes management. Efforts to refine treatment strategies are crucial in reducing T1D-related complications.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lubasinski N, Thabit H, Nutter PW, Petrescu D, Haper S

Coefficient of Variation to Assess the Reproducibility of Meal-Induced Glycemic Responses: Development of a Clustering Algorithm

JMIR Diabetes 2025;10:e68821

DOI: 10.2196/68821

PMID: 41264796

PMCID: 12633838

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.