Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Dec 1, 2024
Date Accepted: Oct 14, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Needs and expectations for the myNewWayTM blended digital and face-to-face psychotherapy model of care for depression and anxiety (Part 2): Mental health professional co-design study
ABSTRACT
Background:
In blended care, digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) integrate with face-to-face psychotherapy provided in person or via telehealth. To incorporate DMHIs into routine care for depression and anxiety, it is important to understand the needs and expectations of mental health professionals for blended DMHIs.
Objective:
The study objective was to partner with Australian mental health professionals in the design of a transdiagnostic, cognitive behavioral therapy-based blended model of care for adults experiencing depression and anxiety.
Methods:
Participants were Australian health professionals who treat adults with depression and/or anxiety. The co-design process included an online survey (n =258), one-on-one interviews (n=14) and a two-part focus group (n=6). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through the online survey. In-depth qualitative feedback from interviews and the two-part focus group were subjected to reflexive thematic analysis.
Results:
Mental health professionals found blended care with face-to-face therapy more acceptable than telehealth and blended care with telehealth, with standalone DMHIs being the least preferred option. The most common ways in which mental health professionals thought a DMHI could integrate with face-to-face psychotherapy included homework completion, psychoeducation and skills practice to support in-session therapy. Mental health professionals expect the blended DMHI to be easy to use, flexible, protective of client data and include evidence-based content from several therapeutic modalities (e.g., CBT, mindfulness). Other preferences included mental health professionals being able to prescribe specific program modules to their clients, track the treatment progress of clients and receive alerts if their clients' symptoms worsened. In terms of implementation, mental health professionals were concerned about the effort and time needed to use blended care. They suggested ongoing training and support would help mental health professionals implement blended care with their clients. Monitoring client risk and progress via an online dashboard and downloadable summaries was also important.
Conclusions:
Designing DMHIs that support psychotherapy for adults with depression and anxiety has the potential to increase access to evidence-based treatment. Involving mental health professionals in DMHI design is expected to increase their acceptance of DMHIs and facilitate the integration of these digital products into routine care.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.