Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Dec 1, 2024
Date Accepted: Oct 14, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals

Miller RK, O'Moore K, Kikas K, Matheson JAT, Whitton AE, Baldwin P, Li S, Black M, Kampel L, Cockayne N, Tuttlebee F, Fraser C, Carr V, Varghese K, Newby JM

Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e68789

DOI: 10.2196/68789

PMID: 41343853

PMCID: 12677875

Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Mental Health Professional Participatory Design Study

  • Rosemaree Kathleen Miller; 
  • Kathleen O'Moore; 
  • Katarina Kikas; 
  • Julie-Anne Therese Matheson; 
  • Alexis Estelle Whitton; 
  • Peter Baldwin; 
  • Sophie Li; 
  • Melissa Black; 
  • Laura Kampel; 
  • Nicole Cockayne; 
  • Fiona Tuttlebee; 
  • Caitlin Fraser; 
  • Victoria Carr; 
  • Kathleen Varghese; 
  • Jill Maree Newby

ABSTRACT

Background:

In blended care, digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) integrate with face-to-face psychotherapy provided in person or via telehealth. To incorporate DMHIs into routine care for depression and anxiety, it is important to understand the needs and expectations of mental health professionals for blended DMHIs.

Objective:

The study objective was to partner with Australian mental health professionals in the design of a transdiagnostic, cognitive behavioral therapy-based blended model of care for adults experiencing depression and anxiety.

Methods:

Participants were Australian health professionals who treat adults with depression and/or anxiety. The participatory design process included a web-based survey (n =258), one-on-one interviews (n=14) and a two-part focus group (n=6). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through the web-based survey. In-depth qualitative feedback from interviews and the two-part focus group were subjected to reflexive thematic analysis.

Results:

Mental health professionals found blended care with face-to-face therapy more acceptable than telehealth and blended care with telehealth, with standalone DMHIs being the least preferred option. The most common ways in which mental health professionals thought a DMHI could integrate with face-to-face psychotherapy included homework completion (129/178, 72.5%), skills practice to support in-session therapy (128/178, 71.9%) and psychoeducation (127/178, 71.3%). Mental health professionals expect the blended DMHI to be easy to use, flexible, protective of client data and include evidence-based content from several therapeutic modalities (e.g., CBT, mindfulness). Other preferences included mental health professionals being able to prescribe specific program modules to their clients, track the treatment progress of clients and receive alerts if their clients' symptoms worsened. In terms of implementation, mental health professionals were concerned about the effort and time needed to use blended care. They suggested ongoing training and support would help mental health professionals implement blended care with their clients. Monitoring client risk and progress via an online dashboard and downloadable summaries was also important.

Conclusions:

Designing DMHIs that support psychotherapy for adults with depression and anxiety has the potential to increase access to evidence-based treatment. Involving mental health professionals in DMHI design is expected to increase their acceptance of DMHIs and facilitate the integration of these digital products into routine care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Miller RK, O'Moore K, Kikas K, Matheson JAT, Whitton AE, Baldwin P, Li S, Black M, Kampel L, Cockayne N, Tuttlebee F, Fraser C, Carr V, Varghese K, Newby JM

Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e68789

DOI: 10.2196/68789

PMID: 41343853

PMCID: 12677875

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.