Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Intensive, Repeated Self-Report Measures:Should We Be Concerned about Changes in Data Quality Over Time?
Arthur A. Stone;
Stefan Schneider;
Meynard Toledo;
Raymond Hernandez
ABSTRACT
Background:
There are many concerns about repeated measurement with self-report methods that are discussed in this paper. These points deserve to be considered by those using intensive, repeated self-report designs.
Objective:
To outline the potential issues with repeated measures intensive measurement studies.
Methods:
This is primarily a discussion/opinion paper.
Results:
Many concerns about intensive, repeated measurement designs are discussed.
Conclusions:
There are many concerns that researchers using this methodology should consider and, if possible, address.
Citation
Please cite as:
Stone AA, Schneider S, Toledo M, Hernandez R
Intensive, Repeated Self-Report Measures: Should We Be Concerned About Changes in Data Quality Over Time?