Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Date Submitted: Nov 10, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 20, 2025
Date Accepted: Mar 25, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
A Method for Custom-Contoured Cushion Fabrication Based on Pressure Mapping for Wheelchair Users to Prevent Pressure Ulcers: A pilot study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Pressure ulcers (PUs) constitute a major healthcare burden, characterized by significant morbidity, diminished quality of life, and elevated treatment costs. Wheelchair users are predisposed to PUs due to sustained ischial and sacral interface pressures resulting from prolonged periods of sitting. Implementation of pressure-relieving interventions, including specialized seating systems engineered to redistribute load and augment the weight-bearing surface area, is critical for mitigating PUs risk.
Objective:
To evaluate a methodology for the custom fabrication of pressure relief cushions, utilizing user-cushion interface pressure mapping to reduce high-pressure areas and increase contact area in wheelchair users.
Methods:
First, a validation study was carried out with seven healthy volunteers. The pressure was determined using an FSA sensor (BodiTrak BT1510), and the cushion profile was obtained through a linear relation with pressure values. In the second phase, ten cushions for wheelchair users were manufactured and tested. The resulting data from buttock pressure using a flat foam, Jay® X2 (gel-foam), ROHO® HP (air), and customed-contoured cushions was analyzed and compared using the following four variables: peak pressure (PP), peak pressure index (PPI), mean pressure (MP), and contact area (CA).
Results:
In the validation study, the statistically significant difference between the flat and the custom-contoured cushion showed a better performance in pressure relief for the custom cushion, MP was 27.3(4.5) mmHg and 34.6(3.5) mmHg (P <0.001). Regarding the study with wheelchair users, custom-contoured cushions had lower PP (91.3 (36.0) mmHg), PPI (69.5 (33.7) mmHg), and MP (34.2 (17.4) mmHg) against flat, Jay® X2, and ROHO® HP cushions (P <0.005). The CA (1457.6 (254.1) cm2) was greater for the contoured cushion (P <0.001) than for flat and ROHO cushions; nevertheless, it was not significantly different from Jay X2 (P=0.595).
Conclusions:
The main finding is that the buttock pressure mapping method produces custom-contoured cushions that, compared to commercial cushions, have good pressure distribution and increased contact area. These results suggest that pressure mapping is a good alternative for manufacturing affordable custom-contoured cushions that can prevent the development of pressure ulcers.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.