Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 4, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 4, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Striking a Balance: Mitigating Fraud While Ensuring Equity in Online Qualitative Research Recruitment

Cho E, Lewis LF, Broden E

Striking a Balance: Mitigating Fraud While Ensuring Equity in Online Qualitative Research Recruitment

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68393

DOI: 10.2196/68393

PMID: 40865087

PMCID: 12423605

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Striking a Balance: Mitigating Fraud While Ensuring Equity in Online Qualitative Research Recruitment

  • Eunji Cho; 
  • Laura Foran Lewis; 
  • Elizabeth Broden

ABSTRACT

After the COVID-19 pandemic, online recruitment became a critical component of qualitative research in healthcare fields. However, fraudulent participants targeting research incentives have become more prevalent in health studies, raising significant issues for research ethics, data integrity, and the inclusion of diverse patient voices. While qualitative health research aims to listen to and amplify patients’ and communities’ voices, such fraud can severely impact research quality and foster mistrust toward participants. This issue is particularly critical in qualitative studies, where careful communication, engagement, and mutual trust between researchers and participants are hallmarks of the research process, especially when working with marginalized populations. Behaviors that researchers may associate with fraudulent participants also appear in the communication patterns of marginalized groups, especially when discussing sensitive topics. This similarity could lead to misplaced suspicion, unintentionally disadvantaging marginalized populations when they attempt to share their experiences. In this paper, three qualitative nursing researchers reflect on their experiences with recruitment and data collection in recent studies, including methods to address challenges with potentially fraudulent participants, existing strategies from prior studies facing similar issues, unaddressed areas requiring future attention, and ways to promote inclusivity for diverse and marginalized populations who may be disproportionately affected by mistrust in participant integrity.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Cho E, Lewis LF, Broden E

Striking a Balance: Mitigating Fraud While Ensuring Equity in Online Qualitative Research Recruitment

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68393

DOI: 10.2196/68393

PMID: 40865087

PMCID: 12423605

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.