Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Nov 2, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 11, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Feedback From Dental Students Using Two Alternate Coaching Methods: Qualitative Focus Group Study

Alkattan R, Alreshaid L

Feedback From Dental Students Using Two Alternate Coaching Methods: Qualitative Focus Group Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e68309

DOI: 10.2196/68309

PMID: 40101164

PMCID: 11936305

Feedback from dental students using two alternate coaching methods: a course-based evaluation

  • Rana Alkattan; 
  • Lulwah Alreshaid

ABSTRACT

Background:

Student feedback is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of institutions. However, implementing feedback can be challenging due to practical difficulties. While student feedback on courses can improve teaching, there is debate about its effectiveness if not well-written to provide helpful information to the receiver.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of coaching on proper feedback given by dental students in Saudi Arabia.

Methods:

First-year dental students were asked to complete three surveys throughout the academic year. The surveys assessed their feedback on the course, including lectures, practical sessions, exams, and overall experience. The surveys were distributed without coaching, after handout coaching and after workshop coaching on how to provide feedback, designated as survey #1, survey #2 and survey #3, respectively. The responses were then rated as neutral, positive, negative, or constructive by two raters. The feedback was analyzed to compare the effectiveness of the different coaching approaches.

Results:

While no significant changes were found between the first two surveys, a significant increase in constructive feedback was observed in survey #3 after workshop coaching (P<.001). The results also showed a higher proportion of desired changes in feedback, determined as a change from any rating to constructive rating, after survey #3 (P<.001). Overall, 20.2% reported desired changes at survey #2 and 41.5% at survey #3 compared to survey #1.

Conclusions:

This study suggests that workshops on feedback coaching can effectively improve the quality of feedback provided by dental students. Incorporating feedback coaching into dental school curricula could help students communicate their concerns more effectively, ultimately enhancing the learning experience.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Alkattan R, Alreshaid L

Feedback From Dental Students Using Two Alternate Coaching Methods: Qualitative Focus Group Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e68309

DOI: 10.2196/68309

PMID: 40101164

PMCID: 11936305

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.