Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Oct 29, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 11, 2024 - Jan 6, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 25, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Co-Designed Digital Device for Tracking Rehabilitation Dosage in a Clinical Environment After Stroke: Mixed Methods Validity and Feasibility Study

Boyd F, Sweeney G, Barber M, Forrest E, Dunlop M, Kerr A

Co-Designed Digital Device for Tracking Rehabilitation Dosage in a Clinical Environment After Stroke: Mixed Methods Validity and Feasibility Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e68129

DOI: 10.2196/68129

PMID: 40367485

PMCID: 12094528

A Co-designed Digital Device for Tracking Rehabilitation Dosage After Stroke: Validity and Feasibility Study in a Clinical Environment

  • Fiona Boyd; 
  • Gillian Sweeney; 
  • Mark Barber; 
  • Elaine Forrest; 
  • Mark Dunlop; 
  • Andrew Kerr

ABSTRACT

Background:

In 2023, the National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke revised the recommended daily multidisciplinary therapy dose from 45 minutes to 3 hours. To monitor the achievement of these guidelines there is a need for accurate measurement. This study introduces a novel co-designed digital dosage tracking system that utilises Near Field Communication (NFC) technology to log rehabilitation activities and demonstrates its feasibility and accuracy in a clinical setting through comparison with the current clinical method of manual recording.

Objective:

This study aimed to assess the validity, feasibility, and usability of a novel co-designed digital tracker using Near Field Communication (NFC) technology to automatically log rehabilitation dosage in stroke patients, providing an objective and low-burden solution for clinical environments.

Methods:

This pilot mixed-methods study included two phases. Phase 1 involved a usability trial with nine participants conducted at a university research centre, assessing usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Phase 2 consisted of a clinical trial in an NHS stroke ward with 15 inpatients, comparing the digital tracker with manual therapist recordings for validity and feasibility using paired t-tests, Cohen's D, and Bland-Altman plots. An acceptable discrepancy range was set at ±5-10%.

Results:

The digital tracker demonstrated high usability with a mean SUS score of 91.43 (SD = 9.53) and strong user satisfaction (IMI score 6.29/7, SD = 1.50). Clinical trial results showed a strong agreement between the digital and manual methods (t(207)=-1.55, P=.12, Cohen’s D=-0.06), with a small mean time discrepancy of 1.18 minutes (SD = 10.98) across 208 activities. The Bland-Altman plot indicated good accuracy and consistency between methods, with limits of agreement within the clinically acceptable range.

Conclusions:

The co-designed digital tracker has been shown to agree with a manual method for recording rehabilitation dosage. This development presents the opportunity for objective, automated and low-burden recording of rehabilitation dose to support prescription, monitoring and research. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05981729 IRAS ID No. 329156


 Citation

Please cite as:

Boyd F, Sweeney G, Barber M, Forrest E, Dunlop M, Kerr A

Co-Designed Digital Device for Tracking Rehabilitation Dosage in a Clinical Environment After Stroke: Mixed Methods Validity and Feasibility Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e68129

DOI: 10.2196/68129

PMID: 40367485

PMCID: 12094528

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.