Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Oct 25, 2024
Date Accepted: Dec 25, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
VaPCE: Validation tool for postcoordinated SNOMED CT expressions
ABSTRACT
Background:
The digitalization of healthcare has increased the demand for efficient data exchange, emphasizing semantic interoperability. SNOMED CT, a comprehensive terminology with over 360,000 medical concepts, supports this need. But it cannot cover all medical scenarios, particularly in complex cases. To address this, SNOMED CT allows postcoordination, where users combine precoordinated concepts to new expressions. Despite SNOMED CT’s potential, the creation and validation of postcoordinated expressions (PCE) remain challenging due to complex syntactic and semantic rules.
Objective:
This work aims to develop a tool that validates postcoordinated SNOMED CT expressions, focusing on providing users with detailed, automated correction instructions for syntactic and semantic errors. The goal is not just validation, but also offering user-friendly, actionable suggestions for improving PCEs.
Methods:
A tool was created using the FHIR service $validate-code and the terminology server Ontoserver to check the correctness of PCEs. When errors are detected, the tool processes the SNOMED CT Concept Model in JSON format and applies predefined error categories. For each error type, specific correction suggestions are generated and displayed to users. The tool was integrated into a web application, where users can validate individual PCEs or bulk-upload files. The tool was tested with real existing PCEs, which were used as input and validated. In the event of errors, appropriate error messages were generated as output.
Results:
In the validation of 136 PCEs from 304 FHIR Questionnaires, 18 PCEs (13.23%) were invalid, with the most common errors being invalid attribute values. Additionally, 868 OncoTree codes were evaluated, resulting in 161 PCEs (20.85%) containing inactive concepts, which were successfully replaced with valid alternatives. A user survey reflects a favourable evaluation of the tool's functionality. Participants found the error categorization and correction suggestions to be precise, offering clear guidance for addressing issues. However, there is potential for enhancement, particularly regarding the level of detail in the error messages.
Conclusions:
The validation tool significantly improves the accuracy of postcoordinated SNOMED CT expressions by not only identifying errors but also offering detailed correction instructions. This approach supports healthcare professionals in ensuring that their PCEs are syntactically and semantically valid, enhancing data quality and interoperability across systems.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.