Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Oct 24, 2024
Date Accepted: Jun 26, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Predicting Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients Before Elective Surgery: Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Wu SCJ, Sharma N, Bauch A, Yang HC, Hect JL, Thomas C, Wagner S, Förstner BR, von Arnim CA, Kaufmann T, Eschweiler GW, Wolfers T, PAWEL Study Group

Predicting Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients Before Elective Surgery: Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e67958

DOI: 10.2196/67958

PMID: 40828691

PMCID: 12364014

Predicting Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients before Elective Surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

  • Shun-Chin Jim Wu; 
  • Nitin Sharma; 
  • Anne Bauch; 
  • Hao-Chun Yang; 
  • Jasmine L. Hect; 
  • Christine Thomas; 
  • Sören Wagner; 
  • Bernd R. Förstner; 
  • Christine A.F. von Arnim; 
  • Tobias Kaufmann; 
  • Gerhard W. Eschweiler; 
  • Thomas Wolfers; 
  • PAWEL Study Group

ABSTRACT

Background:

Elective surgeries for older adults are increasing. Machine learning could enhance risk assessment, influencing surgical planning and postoperative care. Preoperative cognitive assessment may facilitate early detection and management of postoperative delirium (POD).

Objective:

This study aims to assess machine learning models' predictive ability for POD, focusing on added predictive value of the neuropsychological assessments before elective surgery.

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the multicenter PAWEL and PAWEL-R studies, encompassing older patients (≥70 years) undergoing elective surgeries from July 2017 to April 2019. A total of 1624 patients (52.3% male, N = 850; mean age [SD], 77.9 [4.9] years) were included, with POD diagnosis made before discharge. Sociodemographic, clinical, surgical, and neuropsychological features were collected pre- and intraoperatively by care providers. Machine learning model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with permutation testing for significance and SHapley Additive exPlanations to identify effective neuropsychological assessments.

Results:

Predicting POD before surgery with a random forest model achieved an AUC of 0.760. Incorporating all pre- and intraoperative features into the model yielded a slightly higher AUC of 0.783, with no statistically significant difference observed (P= .243). While cognitive factors alone were not strong predictors (AUC=0.617), specific tests within neuropsychological assessments, such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Trail Making Tests, showed high feature attribution and play a crucial role in further enhancing prediction before surgery.

Conclusions:

Preoperative risk prediction for POD can increase risk awareness in presurgical assessment and improve perioperative management in older patients at a high risk for delirium. Clinical Trial: The study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register under the identifiers DRKS12797 and DRKS13311.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wu SCJ, Sharma N, Bauch A, Yang HC, Hect JL, Thomas C, Wagner S, Förstner BR, von Arnim CA, Kaufmann T, Eschweiler GW, Wolfers T, PAWEL Study Group

Predicting Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients Before Elective Surgery: Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e67958

DOI: 10.2196/67958

PMID: 40828691

PMCID: 12364014

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.