Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Oct 23, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 23, 2024 - Dec 18, 2024
Date Accepted: May 12, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Technology Acceptance Model in Medical Education: Systematic Review

Lee JWY, Tan J, Bello F

Technology Acceptance Model in Medical Education: Systematic Review

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e67873

DOI: 10.2196/67873

PMID: 40668663

PMCID: 12285687

Technology Acceptance Model in Medical Education: A systematic review

  • Jason Wen Yau Lee; 
  • Jenelle Tan; 
  • Fernando Bello

ABSTRACT

Background:

The growing use of technology means that there is a need for a framework that can evaluate the learners’ and educators’ acceptance of these technologies. In this context, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) offers a valuable theoretical framework, providing insights into the determinants influencing the users' acceptance and adoption of technology.

Objective:

This study aims to systematically synthesize the body of research in medical education that employs the TAM.

Methods:

An electronic literature search was conducted using the PRISMA approach in February 2024 on the Embase, Medline, PyscINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science databases, yielding 680 articles. Upon elimination of duplicates and applying the exclusion criteria, a total of 39 articles were retained. To evaluate the quality of the study, the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) score was calculated for each analysis with a qualitative component.

Results:

The review found that the studies using TAM only started in 2010, with the model relatively sparse until 2021. Most of the studies were quantitative, operationalizing the TAM as a survey instrument, but it was also used as a research framework in qualitative data analysis. SEM, descriptive analysis, and correlation analysis are the most common data analysis approaches in the study. E-learning and mobile learning were the predominant learning interventions explored, but there were indications that novel learning technologies such as augmented reality, virtual reality, and 3D printing were being investigated.

Conclusions:

The study's findings reveal an expanding scholarly engagement with the use of TAM in medical education. While the TAM has been mostly used as a survey instrument, it can also be adapted as a research framework to analyze data qualitatively. This systematic review provides a foundation for future research to understand the factors influencing users' acceptance of technology, especially in medical education. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lee JWY, Tan J, Bello F

Technology Acceptance Model in Medical Education: Systematic Review

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e67873

DOI: 10.2196/67873

PMID: 40668663

PMCID: 12285687

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.