Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 23, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 6, 2024 - Jan 1, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 11, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Experiences of Peer Mentoring Sexual and Gender Minority Emerging Adults Who Are at Risk for Suicide: Mixed Methods Study

Tran JT, Webster J, Wolfe JR, Ben Nathan J, Mayinja L, Kautz M, Oquendo MA, Brown GK, Mandell D, Mowery D, Bauermeister JA, Brown LA

Experiences of Peer Mentoring Sexual and Gender Minority Emerging Adults Who Are at Risk for Suicide: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67814

DOI: 10.2196/67814

PMID: 39879591

PMCID: 11822318

Experiences of Peer Mentoring Sexual and Gender Minority Emerging Adults who are at risk for Suicide: A Mixed Methods Study

  • Jennifer T. Tran; 
  • Jessica Webster; 
  • James R. Wolfe; 
  • Jennifer Ben Nathan; 
  • Lindiwe Mayinja; 
  • Marin Kautz; 
  • Maria A. Oquendo; 
  • Gregory K. Brown; 
  • David Mandell; 
  • Danielle Mowery; 
  • José A. Bauermeister; 
  • Lily A. Brown

ABSTRACT

Background:

Emerging adult sexual and gender minority people (EASGM) are at increased risk for suicide due to unique experiences including discrimination, family/friend rejection, and low positive affect. Peer Mentors (PMs) may offer a unique opportunity for intervention but are underutilized for suicide prevention among EASGM.

Objective:

We developed an intervention, Supporting Transitions to Adulthood and Reducing Suicide (STARS), to improve suicide prevention among EASGM and increase social support, coping, and positive affect. Peer Mentors meet virtually for six weeks, providing social support, strategies to diminish the impact of discrimination, connection to safe spaces, and reinforcement of intentions to use Safety Plans.

Methods:

To understand PMs’ experiences in their role, including distress, fidelity to the manual, and perceptions of feasibility and acceptability of STARS and participants’ Safety Plan, we collected survey data from participants and PMs as well as in-depth interviews with PMs after the completion of the intervention.

Results:

PMs reported overall high comfort (8.52; SD=1.60) and low distress (1.93; SD = .87) during sessions. PMs had high fidelity (>90%) to the PM intervention training. PMs reported high feasibility (17.50; SD = 2.38), acceptability (20; SD = 0), and appropriateness (20; SD = 0) of the STARS intervention.

Conclusions:

Peer mentorship for EASGM who are at risk for suicide was deemed as feasible and acceptable by PMs and participants alike. PMs reported that they felt comfortable and confident during the sessions. Future research should explore the optimal strategies to support PMs and participants as they engage in suicide prevention work as well as incorporate feedback from the PMs in this study to ensure optimal outcomes. Clinical Trial: NCT05018143


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tran JT, Webster J, Wolfe JR, Ben Nathan J, Mayinja L, Kautz M, Oquendo MA, Brown GK, Mandell D, Mowery D, Bauermeister JA, Brown LA

Experiences of Peer Mentoring Sexual and Gender Minority Emerging Adults Who Are at Risk for Suicide: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67814

DOI: 10.2196/67814

PMID: 39879591

PMCID: 11822318

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.