Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Mental Health (no longer under consideration since Oct 16, 2024)

Date Submitted: Oct 15, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 16, 2024 - Oct 16, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder: A Mixed-Methods Study of Clinical Diagnosis and Demographic Trends

  • Damont Combs

ABSTRACT

Background:

Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder (CSBD) is characterized by repetitive and intense sexual urges and behaviors that individuals find difficult to control, leading to significant distress and impairment in daily life. Although CSBD has been recognized in the ICD-11, there is ongoing debate regarding its classification, particularly whether it should be categorized as a behavioral addiction or an impulse control disorder. Additionally, questions about the neurobiological mechanisms involved in CSBD contribute to the complexity of diagnosis and treatment approaches.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to investigate the classification, diagnosis, and treatment efficacy of Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder (CSBD), focusing on its neurobiological underpinnings and the influence of cultural factors on diagnosis. The study also aims to provide a standardized diagnostic framework that can guide clinical and public health practices.

Methods:

This study employs a mixed-methods design, integrating both qualitative and quantitative approaches. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians to gain insights into the diagnostic challenges and treatment practices for CSBD. We also reviewed existing literature on CSBD to contextualize the clinical findings, focusing on neurobiological mechanisms such as those identified through fMRI and EEG studies. Finally, a cross-sectional survey was performed to gather demographic and behavioral data from individuals diagnosed with CSBD.

Results:

The analysis suggests that CSBD aligns more closely with behavioral addiction, given its association with the brain's reward pathways, particularly dopamine dysregulation. Cultural factors emerged as a significant influence on the perception and diagnosis of CSBD, with clinicians reporting variability in how sexual behavior is judged across different populations. Moreover, a lack of long-term studies on treatment efficacy presents a gap in the current literature, making it difficult to determine the long-term success of therapeutic interventions such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and pharmacological treatments (e.g., SSRIs).

Conclusions:

The findings underscore the need for a standardized diagnostic framework for CSBD, one that accounts for both neurobiological and cultural factors. Standardizing the diagnosis could lead to more consistent treatment approaches and influence both clinical practices and public health policies. To address current gaps in the literature, future research should prioritize longitudinal studies that assess the durability of various treatment interventions, with a focus on integrating neurobiological data to further refine diagnostic and treatment protocols. Clinical Trial: this study is not a clinical trial, thus does not require registration


 Citation

Please cite as:

Combs D

Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder: A Mixed-Methods Study of Clinical Diagnosis and Demographic Trends

JMIR Preprints. 15/10/2024:67583

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.67583

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/67583

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.