Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Pick the pocket: concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of a smartphone-based Timed Up and Go Test self-assessment for older adults
Melissa Johanna Böttinger;
Sabato Mellone;
Jochen Klenk;
Carl-Philipp Jansen;
Marios Stefanakis;
Elena Litz;
Anastasia Bredenbrock;
Jan-Philipp Fischer;
Jürgen M. Bauer;
Clemens Becker;
Katharina Gordt-Oesterwind
ABSTRACT
Background:
The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) is recommended as an evidence-based tool for measuring physical ca-pacity. Instrumented TUG (iTUG) approaches expand classical supervised clinical applications offering the potential of self-assessment for older adults.
Objective:
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of a smartphone-based TUG self-assessment (“up&go app”).
Methods:
Fifty-two community-dwelling older adults (>67 years) were recruited. A validated and medically certified system attached with a belt at the lower back was used as a reference system to validate the “up&go app” algorithm. The participants repeated the TUG five times wearing (1) a smartphone with the “up&go app” in the front trouser pocket and (2) an intertial sensor to test the concurrent validity. A subsample of 37 participants repeated the “up&go app” measurement two weeks later to examine the test-retest reliability.
Results:
The correlation between the “up&go app” and the reference measurement was r=0.99 for the total test duration and r=0.97 for the five single repetitions. Agreement between the five repetitions was ICC=0.90 [0.84-0.94]. Leaving out the first repetition, the agreement was ICC=0.95 [0.92-0.97]. Test-retest agreement had an ICC = 0.79 [0.53-0.90].
Conclusions:
The duration of five repetitions of the TUG test, measured with the pocket-worn “up&go app”, was very consistent with the results of a lower-back sensor system, indicating excellent concurrent validity. Partic-ipants walked slower in the first round compared to the other four repetitions within a test run. Test-retest reliability was also excellent. The “up&go app” provides a useful smartphone-based approach to measure five repetitions of the TUG. The app could be used by older adults as a self-screening and moni-toring tool of physical capacity at home and thereby help to early identify functional limitations and take interventions when necessary.
Citation
Please cite as:
Böttinger MJ, Mellone S, Klenk J, Jansen CP, Stefanakis M, Litz E, Bredenbrock A, Fischer JP, Bauer JM, Becker C, Gordt-Oesterwind K
A Smartphone-Based Timed Up and Go Test Self-Assessment for Older Adults: Validity and Reliability Study